VMware Cloud Community
aenagy
Hot Shot
Hot Shot
Jump to solution

Diagnosing PDL [ESXi 6.x]

While studying for my VCP6-DCA I came across the following sample question:

----- start question -----

An administrator runs the command esxcli storage core device list and sees the following output:

mpx.vmhba1:C0:T0:L0

  Display Name: RAID 5 (mpx.vmhba1:C0:T0:L0)

  Has Settable Display Name: false

  SizE. 40960

  Device Type: Direct-Access

  Multipath Plugin: NMP Devfs

  Path: /vmfs/devices/disks/mpx.vmhba1:C0:T0:L0

  Status: off

  Is Local: true

What can be determined by this output?

A. The device is a being used for vFlash Read Cache.

B. The device is in a Permanent Device Loss (PDL) state.

C. The device is a local Solid State Device (SSD).

D. The device is in an All Paths Down (APD) state.

Answer: B. The device is in a Permanent Device Loss (PDL) state.

----- end question -----

The only clue I see about the state of the device is "Status: off".  The explanation for this answer includes a reference to https://kb.vmware.com/kb/2004684 which is about PDL but does not include a reference to "Status: off", and I found https://kb.vmware.com/kb/2004605 which does include a reference to "Status: off" but does not explicitly refer to PDL

1) Is this device in a state of PDL?

2) If yes, is "Status: off" sufficient to make this diagnosis?

3) ... and can local (Is Local: true) and/or direct (Device Type: Direct-Access) devices be in as state of PDL? I realize that this sounds like a dumb question but the KBs seem to be really focused on array devices.

4) Even though KB 2004605 does not explicitly state that the devices are in a state of PDL can this be (safely) assumed?

Thanks.

0 Kudos
1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
daphnissov
Immortal
Immortal
Jump to solution

1) Is this device in a state of PDL?

     Yes

2) If yes, is "Status: off" sufficient to make this diagnosis?

     Yes

3) ... and can local (Is Local: true) and/or direct (Device Type: Direct-Access) devices be in as state of PDL? I realize that this sounds like a dumb question but the KBs seem to be really focused on array devices.

     Yes. Any device is capable of showing an off status.

4) Even though KB 2004605 does not explicitly state that the devices are in a state of PDL can this be (safely) assumed?

     Essentially, yes.

View solution in original post

1 Reply
daphnissov
Immortal
Immortal
Jump to solution

1) Is this device in a state of PDL?

     Yes

2) If yes, is "Status: off" sufficient to make this diagnosis?

     Yes

3) ... and can local (Is Local: true) and/or direct (Device Type: Direct-Access) devices be in as state of PDL? I realize that this sounds like a dumb question but the KBs seem to be really focused on array devices.

     Yes. Any device is capable of showing an off status.

4) Even though KB 2004605 does not explicitly state that the devices are in a state of PDL can this be (safely) assumed?

     Essentially, yes.