I did go through the menu and my Linux VM saw this weirdo "/mnt/hgfs" thing.
But it does not support hard links. POSIX requires file systems to support hard
links, the underlying OS/X file system does and the various normal Linux
file systems do. "hgfs" does not. That is utterly inexcusable. Meanwhile,
I *must* have a shared file system that supports hard links: NFS.
So, my OS/X has a /etc/exports file with the most permissive settings I know how to make.
My VM can see the NFS export just fine. "showmount -e 10.0.0.120" shows it just fine.
But when I try to mount the blasted thing, I get "access denied by server" with or without
the "vers=3" option. (Apple being really, really, really slow to the NFSv4 table.)
Has anybody actually solved this? It surely seems like a common thing folks would want to do.
Just a thought. Do you have a Firewall running on your NFS server? If so, you need to either:
I would turn off the firewalls on both ends first to get it to work, and then enable the firewalls again.
Hope this helps.
Thank you, but no, that isn't the problem. I can NFS mount the directory from another UNIX box that is not a VM (viz. physically external to the OS/X platform). So, OS/X is properly sharing the directory and it is not blocking access. It is to do with the VM network inside the OS/X box.
I can NFS mount the directory from another UNIX box that is not a VM (viz. physically external to the OS/X platform). So, OS/X is properly sharing the directory and it is not blocking access. It is to do with the VM network inside the OS/X box.
One does not exclude the other. Your OS/X can still be blocking access to your VM.
See this article here: ESX NFS storage on linux
It's for setting up an NFS share for ESX, but the global steps still apply, although you shouldn't need to set things up like root_squash.
As you can see there, you can specify which hosts can connect using the hosts.allow file.
--
Wil
Thank you. That helped point me in the right direction.
<pre>
$ rpcinfo -p 127.0.0.1|grep -w 111
100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper
100000 2 udp 111 portmapper
</pre>
It is an OS/X issue: they only support NFSv2 and the client OS only supports v3 and v4.
v4 is too new: it is only about a decade old. Apple needs more time.
So, the answer is one of:
So thank you for getting me pointed the right direction. Regards, Bruce
I'm glad to hear that you read the article long enough to find the troubleshooting session as I did forget to mention that.
That seems to be very weird, why would apple only support version 2 NFS? It's not like they don't get version 3 for free or that it isn't released for many many years.
When I look at this article NFS Server on OS/X then it appears that only portmapper is version 2.
Somewhere else I also read that if you add "-o vers=3" in the mount command (or add 'vers=3' to the options field in fstab) that you will force it to mount as version 3. There might be syntactical differences as somewhere else I see it mentioned as "-o nfsvers=3" so check your linux distro using man mount.
Hope this helps,
--
Wil
The portmapper results were on the server, meaning that it only exported version 2. I would need to find an NFS v3 or 4 server that ran on OS/X before I could use the "-o ver3" option on the client side. I tried the option early on, but it did not work and now I know why. My openSuSE server exports all three versions (2, 3 and 4) and the client on my VM negotiates the best deal (v4).
I also have some doubt that portmapper is the cause. It will report whatever gets registered. If a v3 capable service registers v3 of its interface, portmapper will happily report it. If the 10.7 (tiger? leapord? whatever. "uname -r" says "10.7.4" and all the various help articles presume folks know what it means) the 10.7 version of the NFS server is v3 capable, it isn't registering it. Adding "-o ver3" on the client won't help. I guess I need some server side option that says, "advertise all of your capabilities".
In the end, it is inexcusable that this is this hard. But it is an Apple issue, not a VMware issue. The VMware issue is the file system that does not support hard links. That is dumb.