<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>roybfr Tracker</title>
    <link>https://communities.vmware.com/wbsdv95928/tracker</link>
    <description>roybfr Tracker</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2023 11:04:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2023-11-25T11:04:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Re: USB Manangment is Disabled in View Client</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/USB-Manangment-is-Disabled-in-View-Client/m-p/777134#M15628</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This was the issue. Not sure how I missed it in View Manager before but thanks for the help&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 13:17:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/USB-Manangment-is-Disabled-in-View-Client/m-p/777134#M15628</guid>
      <dc:creator>roybfr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-24T13:17:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: USB Manangment is Disabled in View Client</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/USB-Manangment-is-Disabled-in-View-Client/m-p/777131#M15625</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the USB controller installed, made sure it is seen by Xp, &amp;amp; have even rebooted since the install, but still get the "USB Manangement is disable".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 14:39:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/USB-Manangment-is-Disabled-in-View-Client/m-p/777131#M15625</guid>
      <dc:creator>roybfr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-17T14:39:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>USB Manangment is Disabled in View Client</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/USB-Manangment-is-Disabled-in-View-Client/m-p/777129#M15623</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am having issues enabling USB pass through between a Windows XP based terminal &amp;amp; a VM being accessed through View. When I go to click on the "Connect USB Device" option of the View Client tool bar there is a messaged that states "USB Manangment is Disabled".Running version 4.01of both the client &amp;amp; agent. Usb options are installed with both as well. I checked in MS GPMC and made sure 23XXXXXX was in the USB authorize table. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; I am stupmed at this point, don't see others having the same issue so I have to be missing something easy. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 22:19:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/USB-Manangment-is-Disabled-in-View-Client/m-p/777129#M15623</guid>
      <dc:creator>roybfr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-13T22:19:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fusion 3 performance on EFI32 mac w/ SL 32bit kernel vs EFI64 mac w/ SL 64bit kerenel</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-Fusion-Discussions/Fusion-3-performance-on-EFI32-mac-w-SL-32bit-kernel-vs-EFI64-mac/m-p/770751#M43589</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the answer, that is really helpful. I picked up SL tonight and will probably upgrade my Fusion to 3 this week. I plan on order more ram (at 9GB going to go to 16GB) and was thinking of getting an Intel SSD to use for some of my VM's as I have heard good things about them speed wise. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 00:36:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-Fusion-Discussions/Fusion-3-performance-on-EFI32-mac-w-SL-32bit-kernel-vs-EFI64-mac/m-p/770751#M43589</guid>
      <dc:creator>roybfr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-01T00:36:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fusion 3 performance on EFI32 mac w/ SL 32bit kernel vs EFI64 mac w/ SL 64bit kerenel</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-Fusion-Discussions/Fusion-3-performance-on-EFI32-mac-w-SL-32bit-kernel-vs-EFI64-mac/m-p/770749#M43587</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have an older 2006 Mac Pro that is EFI32, so in SL it boots the 32bit kernel. What I am trying to find out is what all is gained by going to a system that has 64EFI such as a new Mac Pro or a 2008 Pro and booting SL with the 64 bit kernel. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The new specs for Fusion 3 list&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI level="1" type="ul"&gt;&lt;P&gt;New 64-bit native core engine leverages power of 64-bit Snow Leopard&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI level="1" type="ul"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Leverage K64 kernel performance improvements for reduced overhead&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can someone put this in a performance perspective? Have people noticed increased performance when moving from Fusion 2 on SL in 32bit kernel to Fusion 3 on SL with 64 bit kerenel?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am looking at upgrading my Pro, buying a used 2008 or getting a new 2009. Money is an object so I am trying to put a performance increase to the cost of the different options. I do a lot of POC items for work at home on my Mac, while the POC tests are usually about getting things to work vs perfromaing fast (work on that post POC at work on ESX 3.5/4 clusters), would still like to know what is gained running Fusion 3 under SL under 64bt kernel vs under SL with a 32bit kerenl.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:15:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-Fusion-Discussions/Fusion-3-performance-on-EFI32-mac-w-SL-32bit-kernel-vs-EFI64-mac/m-p/770749#M43587</guid>
      <dc:creator>roybfr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-31T16:15:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Office 2007 mailto issues - getting internet options to see Thinapp Office</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/ThinApp/Office-2007-mailto-issues-getting-internet-options-to-see/m-p/1196127#M2482</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One last issues we are having with out thinapp version of Office 2007 is what happens when a user clicks on a mailto link in IE. In IE if a user clicks a mailto link it does not open Outlook. I know this is due to the thinapp not be selected as the default email program in Windows Internet Properties. Even after installing using thinreg the office thinapp does not show up as being an option in the  Internet Properties programs tab. In Firefox it works fine as it lets you select an .EXE for the mail program. I check the package.ini and it has mailto listed in the protocols line. Just looking for ideas on where to go from here. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:22:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/ThinApp/Office-2007-mailto-issues-getting-internet-options-to-see/m-p/1196127#M2482</guid>
      <dc:creator>roybfr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-15T18:22:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

