<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>JPScolar1 Tracker</title>
    <link>https://communities.vmware.com/wbsdv95928/tracker</link>
    <description>JPScolar1 Tracker</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 23:47:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2023-11-17T23:47:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VMware Velocloud Edge sizing  Sizing</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VeloCloud-Discussions/VMware-Velocloud-Edge-sizing-Sizing/m-p/2989486#M189</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What Edge size should I use, a VCE-3800 or a VCE-680, for a VCE-HA hub.&amp;nbsp; I have a network (Hub-Spoke) with 150 branch sites, all of them with 1 Internet connection&amp;nbsp; 25/15Mbps + LTE failover. The Hub has 2 Internet cnxs ( 500Mbps and 200Mbps).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The number of tunnels that the hub will have to support is&amp;nbsp; 150 (sites) * 2 ( HUB WAN connections) = 300 tunnels +&amp;nbsp; 4 tunnels to the SD-WAN gateways.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;The VCE680 has a 800 Tunnel capacity and an IMIX of 2G, so in paper, a VCE680 seems a good choice, however I wonder if&amp;nbsp; I may run into pereformance problems eventually.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the VCE300 seems a bit of a overkill but for sure it will work.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any advice will be much appreciated.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 15:01:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VeloCloud-Discussions/VMware-Velocloud-Edge-sizing-Sizing/m-p/2989486#M189</guid>
      <dc:creator>JPScolar1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-03T15:01:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

