<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Nicole_Q_ Tracker</title>
    <link>https://communities.vmware.com/wbsdv95928/tracker</link>
    <description>Nicole_Q_ Tracker</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 06:17:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2023-11-21T06:17:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VM overview performance charts/data don't match the advanced charts/data for the exact same time period.  Why is it?</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Virtual-Machine-Guest-OS-and-VM/VM-overview-performance-charts-data-don-t-match-the-advanced/m-p/2209521#M40498</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;VM overview performance charts/data don't match the advanced charts/data for the exact same time period.&amp;nbsp; Why is it? What I saw was that i viewed the past 1 month performance data on the Overview screen, CPU showed a spike at 22.5% around 9/18-9/20. I did past 1 month CPU performance on Advanced view and it showed the spike on 9/19 at 8.53% Usage. Does anyone have an idea why? And which perf data is more reliable - Overview or Advanced? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2014 16:34:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Virtual-Machine-Guest-OS-and-VM/VM-overview-performance-charts-data-don-t-match-the-advanced/m-p/2209521#M40498</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nicole_Q_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-25T16:34:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is there any issues with VMware ESXi 5.x and SMVI backup/restore when the VMware NFS datastores are of NetApp LUNs on the same NetApp Volume?</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/ESXi-Discussions/Is-there-any-issues-with-VMware-ESXi-5-x-and-SMVI-backup-restore/m-p/896360#M72678</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;First of all, there was a misleading info in my question... it's a SAS storage not NFS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And the answer for this is go with best practice from NetApp 1 LUN per volume as for restoring volume is faster than restoring a file.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:02:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/ESXi-Discussions/Is-there-any-issues-with-VMware-ESXi-5-x-and-SMVI-backup-restore/m-p/896360#M72678</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nicole_Q_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-31T00:02:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is there any issues with VMware ESXi 5.x and SMVI backup/restore when the VMware NFS datastores are of NetApp LUNs on the same NetApp Volume?</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/ESXi-Discussions/Is-there-any-issues-with-VMware-ESXi-5-x-and-SMVI-backup-restore/m-p/896359#M72677</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to find out if there is any issues with VMware ESXi 5.x and&amp;nbsp; SMVI backup/restore when the VMware NFS datastores are of NetApp LUNs on&amp;nbsp; the same NetApp Volume. Any insights are much appreciated. Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 22:24:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/ESXi-Discussions/Is-there-any-issues-with-VMware-ESXi-5-x-and-SMVI-backup-restore/m-p/896359#M72677</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nicole_Q_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-16T22:24:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

