<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>LFC Tracker</title>
    <link>https://communities.vmware.com/wbsdv95928/tracker</link>
    <description>LFC Tracker</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2023 11:57:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2023-11-25T11:57:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mandatory Profile Behavior</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Dynamic-Environment-Manager/Mandatory-Profile-Behavior/m-p/1405711#M2677</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Arnaud&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please accept my aploogies for misunderstanding what you meant. &lt;BR /&gt;I have disabled the &lt;EM style="font-family: proxima-nova, Arial, sans-serif; color: #666666;"&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://docs.vmware.com/en/VMware-User-Environment-Manager/9.5/com.vmware.user.environment.manager-install-config/GUID-EB283A0E-9341-4F86-B536-B9C2C1D06C1F.html" name="&amp;amp;amp;lpos=apps_scodevmw : 115" rel="nofollow" style="color: #3399cc;"&gt;Certificate Support for Mandatory Profiles&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/EM&gt;in the UEM Group ploicy and now my userprofile is showing as a Mandatory.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you very much for your assistance in resolving this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Sean&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 16:39:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Dynamic-Environment-Manager/Mandatory-Profile-Behavior/m-p/1405711#M2677</guid>
      <dc:creator>LFC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-01T16:39:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mandatory Profile Behavior</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Dynamic-Environment-Manager/Mandatory-Profile-Behavior/m-p/1405709#M2675</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just to add, these are Linked Clone desktops, with the pool set to refresh at logoff&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,S&lt;BR /&gt;Sean&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 16:06:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Dynamic-Environment-Manager/Mandatory-Profile-Behavior/m-p/1405709#M2675</guid>
      <dc:creator>LFC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-01T16:06:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mandatory Profile Behavior</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Dynamic-Environment-Manager/Mandatory-Profile-Behavior/m-p/1405708#M2674</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Arnaud&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have e-mailed you a zip bundle. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One logon has the Personal Certificates enabled, whilst the second is with it disabled. Looking at both log files, it seems to think Mandatory profile support for certificates is enable on both&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Sean&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 16:05:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Dynamic-Environment-Manager/Mandatory-Profile-Behavior/m-p/1405708#M2674</guid>
      <dc:creator>LFC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-01T16:05:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mandatory Profile Behavior</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Dynamic-Environment-Manager/Mandatory-Profile-Behavior/m-p/1405706#M2672</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Arnoud&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have just tried disabling the Personal Certificates policy and I am still gettig my user profile marked as Roaming&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Sean&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 13:43:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Dynamic-Environment-Manager/Mandatory-Profile-Behavior/m-p/1405706#M2672</guid>
      <dc:creator>LFC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-01T13:43:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mandatory Profile Behavior</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Dynamic-Environment-Manager/Mandatory-Profile-Behavior/m-p/1405705#M2671</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Arnout&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's a great start as I think this is possibly set as on. Can you tell me what will we lose by disabling this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We do not use S4B, so I'm wondering if there is any downside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards&lt;BR /&gt;Sean&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 13:06:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Dynamic-Environment-Manager/Mandatory-Profile-Behavior/m-p/1405705#M2671</guid>
      <dc:creator>LFC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-01T13:06:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mandatory Profile Behavior</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Dynamic-Environment-Manager/Mandatory-Profile-Behavior/m-p/1405703#M2669</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have an interesting 'issue' relating to Mandatory profiles in conjunction with UEM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have created a mandatory profile for Windows 10 1803, and set the path to be used via Group Policy. Without the UEM agent on the desktop, when users login they load the Mandatory profile, and when you look in the User Profiles applet, the user is listed as having a profile of type 'Mandatory'. The mandatory profile works fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I install the UEM Agent and point at the config share, the user logs on, but the profile is now of type 'roaming'. Its as if the Mandatory profile has been duplicated (as if it where the DEFAULT profile). Everything still work fine, but my customer wants an explanation. All I can think of is that this is by design so that the profile becomes writable to allow UEM to wrap around the imported AppData and registry etc. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know (Pim?) is this by design? and if this behaviour is documented anywhere?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &lt;BR /&gt;Sean&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 12:06:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Dynamic-Environment-Manager/Mandatory-Profile-Behavior/m-p/1405703#M2669</guid>
      <dc:creator>LFC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-01T12:06:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Creating a Variable</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Dynamic-Environment-Manager/Creating-a-Variable/m-p/2267340#M5008</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need to be able to create name "Room" which is based on the first four characters of the Client PC hostname. This provides me with the location of the Client Machine running the Horizon Client in the school so I can use this location information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In a simple batch script, I can retrieve the first four characters successfully using the command &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;set Room="%ViewClient_Machine_Name:~0,4%"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to set this variable in UEM? The 'value' field just looks like a plain text field hat cannot interpret my command&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sean&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2018 11:59:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Dynamic-Environment-Manager/Creating-a-Variable/m-p/2267340#M5008</guid>
      <dc:creator>LFC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-20T11:59:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Best Design for PSC HA across two datacentres</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-vCenter-Discussions/Best-Design-for-PSC-HA-across-two-datacentres/m-p/1408062#M20018</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are implementing vSphere 6.5 U1e for a large environment and I am looking at the most appropriate design for the following:-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2 x Datacentres connected by low latency, high and width links &lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;A Single SSO Domain - vSphere.local (Linked Mode is required)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;We will be deploying a separate vCenter appliance into each DC and using vCenter HA in both DC's&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We could either have ....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2 x PSC in Datacentre in Site DC1 - use F5 Big IP for PSC HA - SSO Site = DC1&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2 x PSC in Datacentre in Site DC2 - use F5 Big IP for PSC HA -&amp;nbsp; SSO Site = DC2&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Issues - &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If for some reason both PSC's in a site were down, since 6.5 it is no longer supported to re-point the VCSA appliances to the PSC appliances in another PSC site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Required 4 x PSC appliances&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a better design? Maybe using the F5's to create a VIP across DC's (active Passive)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sean&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 19:12:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-vCenter-Discussions/Best-Design-for-PSC-HA-across-two-datacentres/m-p/1408062#M20018</guid>
      <dc:creator>LFC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-17T19:12:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UEM High Availability</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Dynamic-Environment-Manager/UEM-High-Availability/m-p/1380026#M2169</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know this is an old thread, but its very relevant to what I am trying to achieve. My customer wants two DC's configured with CloudPod.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My initial thought on how to handle UEM is to use DFS-R to replicate the UEM Config and Archive shares between the two DC's to ensure a consistent experience for the users.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems DFS-R is not supported for the Archive share. How to large companies with multiple instances of Horizon / UEM handle UEM archives?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sean&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:25:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Dynamic-Environment-Manager/UEM-High-Availability/m-p/1380026#M2169</guid>
      <dc:creator>LFC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-12T10:25:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SRM 6.5 and NetApp SRA</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Site-Recovery-Manager/SRM-6-5-and-NetApp-SRA/m-p/1412791#M6925</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am installing a dual datacentre vSphere 6.5 solution which uses NetApp hardware. At the primary ste we have an AFA 200 All flash array, and at the DR site, a 8200 Hybrid array.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We will be using Clustered ONTAP 9.x and Site recovery Manager 6.5.1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I check the compatibility matrix for SRM, it only details a single SRA being available, which is listed as NetApp Santricity SRA which lists only E-Series arrays.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the NetApp site, there is a Virtual Appliance for download, which looks like it is a provides all of the functionality previously provided by the VASA, VCS and SRA software. This is really confusiong as it looks like this is not yet supported by VMware?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does any have SRM 6.5x running with NetApp arrays that can verify what works and what doesn't?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Sean&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 09:56:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Site-Recovery-Manager/SRM-6-5-and-NetApp-SRA/m-p/1412791#M6925</guid>
      <dc:creator>LFC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-21T09:56:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: vSAN Witness - Offsite Location</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-vSAN-Discussions/vSAN-Witness-Offsite-Location/m-p/1391400#M4825</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Jase&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thats bad news for me, as I now have this configuration up and running and it seems to work fine. We did decide to install an additional server in the Germany site to host the witness appliance as per the instruction in the documntation you referenced that it must connect to the same physical switch.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Am I correct in saying that the vSAN VLAN therefore needs to be routable at L3 on the network? If WTS is not supported, then how does the witness communicate with the nodes on the remote vSAN network? My customers WAN infrastructure does not allow us to add/publish additional routed subnets, so this would be a non-starter as communication from another site will not work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I could add a Witness VLAN and make the vSAN VLAN routable within the Germany site, but not out onto the WAN. I could then place the witness host somewhere in the Germany site (not either of the 2 x datacentres) on the Witness subnet and use a routed L3 connection to the vSAN subnet?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does this sound feasible? If not, can you offer any alternatives as my customer has invested a signifcant amount of money&amp;nbsp; in this all flash vSAN solution&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;LFC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2017 07:45:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-vSAN-Discussions/vSAN-Witness-Offsite-Location/m-p/1391400#M4825</guid>
      <dc:creator>LFC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-11T07:45:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: vSAN Witness - Offsite Location</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-vSAN-Discussions/vSAN-Witness-Offsite-Location/m-p/1391396#M4821</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much for your input. I will get this setup in a PO environment to prove the process ahead of the live installation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sean&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 22:14:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-vSAN-Discussions/vSAN-Witness-Offsite-Location/m-p/1391396#M4821</guid>
      <dc:creator>LFC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-07T22:14:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: vSAN Witness - Offsite Location</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-vSAN-Discussions/vSAN-Witness-Offsite-Location/m-p/1391395#M4820</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Dave&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Am I understanding you correctly here?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My vSAN Witness appliance would be resident on a cluster in the UK&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My 4 x vSAN Data hosts would be in Germany.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Germany ESXi hosts 'Management' VMK is routable and manageable from the UK, but the vSAN VMK's are on a Layer 2 stretched VLAN which is inaccessible from the UK.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So so I create an additional VMK on the 'Management' subnet on these hosts and tag for vSAN?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sean&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 16:41:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-vSAN-Discussions/vSAN-Witness-Offsite-Location/m-p/1391395#M4820</guid>
      <dc:creator>LFC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-06T16:41:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: vSAN Witness - Offsite Location</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-vSAN-Discussions/vSAN-Witness-Offsite-Location/m-p/1391394#M4819</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi yezdi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have read that section, however I did not know if this was specifically for the 2 node configuration. Our solution has 4 nodes, 2 in each DC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 12:29:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-vSAN-Discussions/vSAN-Witness-Offsite-Location/m-p/1391394#M4819</guid>
      <dc:creator>LFC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-06T12:29:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>vSAN Witness - Offsite Location</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-vSAN-Discussions/vSAN-Witness-Offsite-Location/m-p/1391392#M4817</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are looking to build a vSAN 6.6 Stretched cluster in one of our clients offices in europe. The DC's are 500m apart and connected by 10g. Each DC has 2 x vSAN hosts and they are on the same L2 VLAN. The vSAN VLAN is not routable, however the Management VLAN is.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no other ESXi systems in the site, but the head office in the UK has a large VMware estate. Is there a solution for this? Reading some of the vSAN documentation there is a suggestion that an additional VMK port can be created on the Management VLAN and tagged for vSAN, but I nned to know if this will work prior to deployment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The alternative is to go with a standard vSAN and raise the FTT to ensure there is always a copy of the data in both DC's&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance, sda24269&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 09:12:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-vSAN-Discussions/vSAN-Witness-Offsite-Location/m-p/1391392#M4817</guid>
      <dc:creator>LFC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-06T09:12:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>O365 / Skype for Business Credentials</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Dynamic-Environment-Manager/O365-Skype-for-Business-Credentials/m-p/1382864#M2195</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I install O365 ProPlus locally on a Windows Desktop and start Skype for Business, I am prompted for my credentials, which I enter.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I then go to Skype4B options and select to start Skype at every Windows logon. Next time I logon I do not have to enter my credentials, they are stored somewhere in my user profile. I know this, as if I delete my local profile, I am prompted again for my creds.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So using UEM on a non-persistent desktop, I want to replicate this behaviour. How do I find out exactly what I need to export from my AppData folder? (We do not use roaming Profiles).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 12:26:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Dynamic-Environment-Manager/O365-Skype-for-Business-Credentials/m-p/1382864#M2195</guid>
      <dc:creator>LFC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-21T12:26:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Office 365 In Base Image</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/App-Volumes/Office-365-In-Base-Image/m-p/1805960#M7185</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;All &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have been trying to get O365 (Office 2016 ProPlus) working in our base image, and now have it to the point were I am happy with it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I now want to build AppStacks for Visio, Project and Visio+Project. I am being told this is not possible as this would be considered as two click to Run packages on the same computer which is NOT supported....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This means that I will need to create everything as AppStacks, and this brings its own set of issues... Does anyone have the above solution working and is it supported?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;LFC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:29:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/App-Volumes/Office-365-In-Base-Image/m-p/1805960#M7185</guid>
      <dc:creator>LFC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-19T15:29:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Office 365 - HELP!!!!!!!!</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/App-Volumes/Office-365-HELP/m-p/2726071#M4840</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have O365 working as expected on AppVolumes AppStacks?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is NOT a new product, so surely someone out there has this working? I have raised a P2 issue with VMwae regarding AppVOlumes and O365. Its been open a week now and I have only just got a response offering a Webex. I will update here if we do manage to fix all these issues&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:25:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/App-Volumes/Office-365-HELP/m-p/2726071#M4840</guid>
      <dc:creator>LFC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-19T15:25:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Office 365 - HELP!!!!!!!!</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/App-Volumes/Office-365-HELP/m-p/2726070#M4839</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have this working to a usable level?&amp;nbsp; Here is what I have found during my extensive testing...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;O365 on Base Image&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I install O365 Core (no Project or Visio) on a Windows 7 Gold Image using -&amp;nbsp; setup.exe /configure /configuration.xml&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I create a non-persistent floating pool - &lt;STRONG&gt;This works fine&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;O365 in AppStack&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have yet to get anything working &lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;properly&lt;/SPAN&gt; in an AppStack.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The installation, completed as per the installation for the gold image completes successfully, &lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The AppStack is attached during logon&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The O365 Apps are present on the machine&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;I launch Word 2016 and am presented with my logon details&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;I enter my credentials&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;I am presented with a grey box and a spinning wheel....This is the EXACT same account that logged in successfully with O365 in the base image!&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;If I leave it long enough, it SOMETIMES logs in, however this may take up to 6minutes. Its pretty much instant when in the base image.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P style="padding-left: 60px;"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="pastedImage_4.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://communities.vmware.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/73228i4D64A6C71F98110E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="pastedImage_4.png" alt="pastedImage_4.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2017 12:26:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/App-Volumes/Office-365-HELP/m-p/2726070#M4839</guid>
      <dc:creator>LFC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-17T12:26:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>To Stretch or not to Stretch.....</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-vSAN-Discussions/To-Stretch-or-not-to-Stretch/m-p/1380490#M4661</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am doing a design for a customer for customer who is deploying 10 vSAN environments. The first 8 are standard 'single DC' vSAN's which I have quite a bit of experience of building.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;9th Site&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The 9th site consists of two computer rooms approximately 500meters apart, connected by 10Gb Fibre.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I see it I have two options:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;1 - Deploy a standard Hybrid vSAN with two fault domains - one in each computer room (each containing 2 or 3 hosts (TBC)).&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2 - Create a vSAN 6.6 Stretched Cluster with a remote witness&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The DC's have sub2ms latency between them, and each have their own internet feed. For simplicity I'm thinking of going for option 1, but can anyone offer any other input?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;10th Site is identical to 9th Site, but 'All Flash'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 15:15:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-vSAN-Discussions/To-Stretch-or-not-to-Stretch/m-p/1380490#M4661</guid>
      <dc:creator>LFC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-14T15:15:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

