<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>MattHumphreys Tracker</title>
    <link>https://communities.vmware.com/wbsdv95928/tracker</link>
    <description>MattHumphreys Tracker</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2023 08:03:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2023-11-15T08:03:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Identifying tasks created by disabling HA and tracking progress - Script to enter maintenance mo</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-PowerCLI-Discussions/Identifying-tasks-created-by-disabling-HA-and-tracking-progress/m-p/2984873#M113095</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So the reconfigure cluster has a bunch of related events but the check compliance one is not one of those tasks so they dont appear to be related and the unconfiguring of the solution from the hosts is also not in that list of related events and they finish at a different time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am basically coming to the point where I feel that I need to do two scripts/steps so one to disable the HA element and the staff just have to watch and wait for tasks to finish then instigate step two which is for the enter maintenance mode part rather than try to do them at the same time.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2023 14:38:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-PowerCLI-Discussions/Identifying-tasks-created-by-disabling-HA-and-tracking-progress/m-p/2984873#M113095</guid>
      <dc:creator>MattHumphreys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-31T14:38:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Identifying tasks created by disabling HA and tracking progress - Script to enter maintenance mo</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-PowerCLI-Discussions/Identifying-tasks-created-by-disabling-HA-and-tracking-progress/m-p/2984822#M113087</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes sadly that flips immediately to $false while the tasks are still running,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have queried the hosts for .ExtensionData.Runtime.DasHostState.State and that also immediately changes when you disable it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have tried looking for the compliance task as that is supposedly the last thing to finish but that is also an unreliable measure of HA status as it can be triggered by other things and if someone else runs a compliance check how do I know its the one for my request&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2023 10:03:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-PowerCLI-Discussions/Identifying-tasks-created-by-disabling-HA-and-tracking-progress/m-p/2984822#M113087</guid>
      <dc:creator>MattHumphreys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-31T10:03:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Identifying tasks created by disabling HA and tracking progress - Script to enter maintenance mode</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-PowerCLI-Discussions/Identifying-tasks-created-by-disabling-HA-and-tracking-progress/m-p/2984679#M113080</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So we have a couple of clusters that contain only 2 hosts for management-related functions, I am trying to automate placing a single host into maintenance mode for our support team to be able to handle hardware related faults and issues both in clusters with greater than 2 hosts and 2 hosts only.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have made some progress but my challenge has come from one location, disabling HA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the method to do it but the challenge is that you send "Set-Cluster -Cluster $cluster -HAEnabled:$false" and it immediately returns "done" but it isnt, it then spawns a whole bunch of child tasks/processes, Reconfiguring the cluster, removing the Solution, configuring the hosts and then checking compliance which can take an unknown amount of time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am really struggling to find a consistent way of identifying those tasks and tracking them and waiting till they are completed and then proceeding to place the host in maintenance mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The user/initiator is not consistent (sometimes its the requestor who runs the script, sometimes its VPXD sometimes its "System")&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There doesnt appear to be a parent ID that I am seeing linking the tasks together, I cant just grab all tasks based on running status because there are other things going on, Veeam backups and other system tasks so I cant just wait for everything to stop.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am kinda stumped on this one, I did look at the VCHA module someone wrote but that seems to apply to all clusters in the entire vcenter and I couldnt see a way to just limit it to a single cluster.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone has any suggestions it would be much appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2023 15:56:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-PowerCLI-Discussions/Identifying-tasks-created-by-disabling-HA-and-tracking-progress/m-p/2984679#M113080</guid>
      <dc:creator>MattHumphreys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-30T15:56:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>vSphere-VMotionDisabled-KB#2054994</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Skyline-Community-Discussions/vSphere-VMotionDisabled-KB-2054994/m-p/2894256#M3071</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So three hosts in maintenance mode are triggering this alert, surely there is some sort of check if the hosts are in maintenance mode or not in use?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you suppress the alert you miss out on any other hosts that might actually be an issue but clearly there is some tweak needed to the logic to check on maintenance mode first?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 11:07:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Skyline-Community-Discussions/vSphere-VMotionDisabled-KB-2054994/m-p/2894256#M3071</guid>
      <dc:creator>MattHumphreys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-18T11:07:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Get VM List based on Multiple Tags</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-PowerCLI-Discussions/Get-VM-List-based-on-Multiple-Tags/m-p/2893908#M105347</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes I have tried it just now and it works as you mentioned, gives me a list of the VM's that match all the specified tags and I have populated it from the list of available tags on the cluster.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also added a limit on the Get-VM's to put it into a limited location so I dont search an entire vcenter just a specific datacenter&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;$location = Get-Datacenter | Out-GridView -Title "Select single location to run checks on" -OutputMode Single

$vms = Get-VM -Location $location -Tag $tagNames

$tagNames | ForEach-Object -Process {
  $vms = Get-VM -Location $location -Tag $_ | where{$vms.Name -contains $_.Name}
}
$vms.Name | Sort-Object |Format-Table -Autosize&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 15:07:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-PowerCLI-Discussions/Get-VM-List-based-on-Multiple-Tags/m-p/2893908#M105347</guid>
      <dc:creator>MattHumphreys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-16T15:07:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Get VM List based on Multiple Tags</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-PowerCLI-Discussions/Get-VM-List-based-on-Multiple-Tags/m-p/2893901#M105345</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for that LucD, that gives me a list of VM's that matches any of the tags in $tagnames, I am looking to get to a list that contains only the VM's that match all of the tags, I have reluctantly come to the conclusion just for expediency that I will have to manually enter the tag information:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Get-VM | Select Name,@{Name="Tags";Expression={(Get-TagAssignment -Entity $_).Tag.Name}} |&lt;BR /&gt;Where {$_.Tags -match "Tag1" -and $_.Tags -match "Tag2" -and $_.Tags -match "Tag3" -and $_.Tags -notmatch "Tag4"} |&lt;BR /&gt;Format-Table -Autosize&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It gives me the response I wanted and allows me to do things like exclude based on a particular tag or with a tag combination.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason for the whole thing is we are using veeam and tag combinations to group machines into backups but veeam doesnt easily display a list of VM's that are captured by the tag combination so I am doing this to get me a list to ensure that everything is correct before the backups run.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:49:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-PowerCLI-Discussions/Get-VM-List-based-on-Multiple-Tags/m-p/2893901#M105345</guid>
      <dc:creator>MattHumphreys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-16T14:49:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Get VM List based on Multiple Tags</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-PowerCLI-Discussions/Get-VM-List-based-on-Multiple-Tags/m-p/2893873#M105342</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am trying to get a script to extract a list of virtual machines that have a particular tag combination from available tags and its proving to be quite difficult.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have been creating a selection of tags based on using Get-Tags and out-gridview to allow the person executing it to decide on what tags they want to filter against.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My problem comes when I am trying to translate that selection into a filter to get a list of VM's with those tags, it could be a varying number of tags in the selection which I wont always know.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also have the problem of trying to make a list of the vms that match all the tags together.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have tried putting them into an array and then calling the tags from the position in the array:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Get-VM | Where-Object{(Get-TagAssignment -Entity $_ ).Tag.Name -Match $tag_checks[0].tag_name -and $tag_checks[1].tag_name}&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;that works but because the array can be any number of tags long that is my issue I dont know how to "create" enough entries for all the items in the array.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have also looked at defining individual variables for each tag:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;$t1 = Get-Tag -Name Name1&lt;BR /&gt;$t2 = Get-Tag -Name Name2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;$tag1 = Get-VM -Tag $t1&lt;BR /&gt;$tag2 = Get-VM -Tag $t2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;$results = $tag1 | ?{$tag2 -contains $_}&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While both get me to the end result I am struggling to make it efficient and repeatable for a large list of VM's&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suspect I have hit a limitation in my programming knowledge, any advice welcomed&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 11:38:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-PowerCLI-Discussions/Get-VM-List-based-on-Multiple-Tags/m-p/2893873#M105342</guid>
      <dc:creator>MattHumphreys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-16T11:38:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VMCPFunctions No Longer Updating GUI</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-PowerCLI-Discussions/VMCPFunctions-No-Longer-Updating-GUI/m-p/2871969#M103721</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Found the problem, I was missing a mandatory parameter, as soon as I added it everything worked correctly.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2021 16:17:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-PowerCLI-Discussions/VMCPFunctions-No-Longer-Updating-GUI/m-p/2871969#M103721</guid>
      <dc:creator>MattHumphreys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-14T16:17:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VMCPFunctions No Longer Updating GUI</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-PowerCLI-Discussions/VMCPFunctions-No-Longer-Updating-GUI/m-p/2871891#M103718</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yeah its certainly very very odd, you use the VCMP module to query it and it returns the expected values but the GUI still shows disabled, you modify a value using the GUI and query it and it returns the expected value.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will raise a SR and see what they say.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2021 10:29:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-PowerCLI-Discussions/VMCPFunctions-No-Longer-Updating-GUI/m-p/2871891#M103718</guid>
      <dc:creator>MattHumphreys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-14T10:29:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>VMCPFunctions No Longer Updating GUI</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-PowerCLI-Discussions/VMCPFunctions-No-Longer-Updating-GUI/m-p/2871888#M103716</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So strange one, we have been using VMCPfunctions module for a while to automate some settings changes we need to accomplish updates on a hyperconverged platform and then revert the changes back to normal production operation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now this was working just fine but recently I have noticed that the settings in the GUI no longer revert to their original position, we query via powerCLI and they are showing as set correctly to what we expect.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The GUI however has everything disabled as though we were in the middle of the change.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I cant seem to resolve this issue and get them to at least display correctly on the web interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have tested this by changing the GUI and then querying:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;$cluster.ExtensionData.Configuration.DasConfig.DefaultVmSettings.VmComponentProtectionSettings.VmStorageProtectionForAPD.ToString()&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I get the answer back I am expecting either restartConservative or disabled but if I set it via the script the above returns the value I expect but does not show anything but "disabled" in the GUI.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2021 10:19:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-PowerCLI-Discussions/VMCPFunctions-No-Longer-Updating-GUI/m-p/2871888#M103716</guid>
      <dc:creator>MattHumphreys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-14T10:19:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Vmware syslog gzip error stops logging</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/ESXi-Discussions/Vmware-syslog-gzip-error-stops-logging/m-p/2834755#M274965</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;so we have a number of hosts that have a syslog location set to a dedicated log datastore which is backed by a dell compellent storage array and we have been suffering from the following errors on a couple of hosts, we have raised a ticket with vmware and were told to create a larger datastore for what I question as dubious reasons (4GB per host you are logging for and some very odd "peformance" reasons)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After having done this we are still seeing a few hosts every now and then throw the error again:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;vmsyslog.loggers..file : ERROR ] Gzip logfile /vmfs/volumes/5dde919e-aa801c3c-e7d7-34e6d7dd4f35/*******.*********.******.****/hostd.0.gz failed.&lt;BR /&gt;Traceback (most recent call last):&lt;BR /&gt;File "/build/mts/release/bora-14320388/bora/build/esx/release/vmvisor/sys-boot/lib64/python3.5/site-packages/vmsyslog/loggers/file.py", line 180, in compressLog&lt;BR /&gt;File "/build/mts/release/bora-14320388/bora/build/esx/release/vmvisor/sys-boot/lib64/python3.5/site-packages/vmsyslog/vmos/base.py", line 240, in compressFile&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone have any suggestions?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 12:30:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/ESXi-Discussions/Vmware-syslog-gzip-error-stops-logging/m-p/2834755#M274965</guid>
      <dc:creator>MattHumphreys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-09T12:30:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cluster Datastore Summary discrepancy - Data errors</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-vSphere-Discussions/Cluster-Datastore-Summary-discrepancy-Data-errors/m-p/2830782#M38154</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So we noticed when checking out some of our datastore clusters some odd data in the vcenter GUI, when you select the datastore cluster -&amp;gt; Monitor -&amp;gt; Connectivity -&amp;gt; Clusters and look at the allocated and used space the numbers are WAY off reality, we have a couple of datastore clusters with 24 and 10TB respectively and they report 170TB allocated space and 105TB used space on the first and 30TB allocated and 31.4 Used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Obviously this is not possible but I am assuming its some sort of bug or display issue in the HTML5 interface, we just upgraded vcenter to the latest 7.0 build.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:02:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-vSphere-Discussions/Cluster-Datastore-Summary-discrepancy-Data-errors/m-p/2830782#M38154</guid>
      <dc:creator>MattHumphreys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-18T15:02:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Virtual Machine has more then 3 Snapshots - Veeam Replica</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Skyline-Community-Discussions/Virtual-Machine-has-more-then-3-Snapshots-Veeam-Replica/m-p/1833953#M1493</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I appreciate that I can mute it but that doesnt solve the underlying issue&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Veeam uses this method for its replicas, which as I understand it is a vmware supported/verified product&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If we mute the finding it will not notify us for all VM's when I only want to exclude a subset of VM's created by veeam, I want to know if this is the case for any standard virtual machine not for the the DR replica's.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2020 07:45:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Skyline-Community-Discussions/Virtual-Machine-has-more-then-3-Snapshots-Veeam-Replica/m-p/1833953#M1493</guid>
      <dc:creator>MattHumphreys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-21T07:45:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Virtual Machine has more then 3 Snapshots - Veeam Replica</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Skyline-Community-Discussions/Virtual-Machine-has-more-then-3-Snapshots-Veeam-Replica/m-p/1833950#M1490</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Scott,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry for that I thought I had posted it in skyline section, if you could relocate it that would be great.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Matt&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:15:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Skyline-Community-Discussions/Virtual-Machine-has-more-then-3-Snapshots-Veeam-Replica/m-p/1833950#M1490</guid>
      <dc:creator>MattHumphreys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-23T10:15:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Virtual Machine has more then 3 Snapshots - Veeam Replica</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Skyline-Community-Discussions/Virtual-Machine-has-more-then-3-Snapshots-Veeam-Replica/m-p/1833948#M1488</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Again I am not running virtual machines, these are powered off replica's of original VM's, the original VM's have no snapshots, only the replica VM's created by veeam have the snapshots and they are all powered off hence my question about a state check before raising the finding.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the VM is powered down but with snapshots that is not relevant as it is not "running"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:35:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Skyline-Community-Discussions/Virtual-Machine-has-more-then-3-Snapshots-Veeam-Replica/m-p/1833948#M1488</guid>
      <dc:creator>MattHumphreys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-23T09:35:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Virtual Machine has more then 3 Snapshots - Veeam Replica</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Skyline-Community-Discussions/Virtual-Machine-has-more-then-3-Snapshots-Veeam-Replica/m-p/1833946#M1486</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We run veeam to replicate virtual machines from one location to another, they have many snapshots attached as per the replication and retention settings and we now get this critical warning, not sure how applicable this is because all the VM's that its alerting for are powered off and are replica's.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your article suggests that 32 snapshots are supported but for optimal performance 2-3 is recommended&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How does that qualify as a "Critical" finding if its just a recommendation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Secondly in terms of performance should there not be some sort of logic check to see if the VM is actually powered on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thirdly all the snapshots are created automatically by Veeam and they have a particular format "Restore Point dd-mm-yyyy HH:MM:SS" as the name and there is a description which contains data that veeam uses, is it possible to setup some logic to exclude these type of snapshots from the logic?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2020 11:10:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Skyline-Community-Discussions/Virtual-Machine-has-more-then-3-Snapshots-Veeam-Replica/m-p/1833946#M1486</guid>
      <dc:creator>MattHumphreys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-19T11:10:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Confusing Finding - Actual results dont match</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vSphere-Upgrade-Install/Confusing-Finding-Actual-results-dont-match/m-p/518269#M5151</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did get this sorted out yes, your patch file is correctly showing "non-compliant"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2020 09:38:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vSphere-Upgrade-Install/Confusing-Finding-Actual-results-dont-match/m-p/518269#M5151</guid>
      <dc:creator>MattHumphreys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-11T09:38:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Skyline Advisor NTP - Not consistent - Incorrect finding</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Skyline-Community-Discussions/Skyline-Advisor-NTP-Not-consistent-Incorrect-finding/m-p/516927#M800</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Ajay,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you get a chance to look at my last reply, still trying to figure this out, as we have several different sites and a third to be added shortly do we need collectors at each site to eliminate this NTP mis match issue or is the only answer to use the same NTP server across several environments?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 08:51:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Skyline-Community-Discussions/Skyline-Advisor-NTP-Not-consistent-Incorrect-finding/m-p/516927#M800</guid>
      <dc:creator>MattHumphreys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-21T08:51:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Confusing Finding - Actual results dont match</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vSphere-Upgrade-Install/Confusing-Finding-Actual-results-dont-match/m-p/518265#M5147</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I followed your steps and it throws an error saying its not a valid offline bundle file.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Step 4 where you say to rename the vib file name, the filename in the offline bundle is called VMW-ESX-6.5.0-igbn-1.4.10-offline_bundle-14160633\vib20\igbn\INT_bootbank_igbn_1.4.10-1OEM.600.0.0.2768847.vib&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I rename that file then the numerous references to that in the metadata will break.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you mean to rename the offline bundle zip? VMW-ESX-6.5.0-igbn-1.4.10-offline_bundle-14160633.zip (i changed that so that I could keep track of which was the un-edited one&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VMware update manager anyway says it cannot upload my edited file because it is not a valid package.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:33:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vSphere-Upgrade-Install/Confusing-Finding-Actual-results-dont-match/m-p/518265#M5147</guid>
      <dc:creator>MattHumphreys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-30T15:33:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Confusing Finding - Actual results dont match</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vSphere-Upgrade-Install/Confusing-Finding-Actual-results-dont-match/m-p/518263#M5145</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That was the link that i use, however I upload the patch to vmware update manager and create a baseline with that patch in, I then attach that baseline to 6.5.0 hosts and scan it and it says that the patch is not applicable to that version of esxi so there is nothing to update, I have verified manually using esxcli that the old incorrect version of the driver is installed, I believe that this is due to the fact that the only version listed in the offiline package metadata is embeddedesxi 6.0.0 it does not mention at all anything about 6.5.0 in that driver package.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:59:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vSphere-Upgrade-Install/Confusing-Finding-Actual-results-dont-match/m-p/518263#M5145</guid>
      <dc:creator>MattHumphreys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-30T09:59:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

