<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NSXV to 2 Distributed Firewall, Host and workload migration in Networking Members</title>
    <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Networking-Members/NSXV-to-2-Distributed-Firewall-Host-and-workload-migration/m-p/2918324#M188</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This option is for migrating Distributed Firewall rules only from NSX-V to T. Yes, you can use User Define Topology option as well. But it all depends on your use-case/requirement. If you don't want to migration the LS from NSX-V to T, you can go with Distributed Firewall only option. But if you want to migrate LS as well as other services (supported with the option) you can use that option.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2022 11:30:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ShahabKhan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-07-12T11:30:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NSXV to 2 Distributed Firewall, Host and workload migration</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Networking-Members/NSXV-to-2-Distributed-Firewall-Host-and-workload-migration/m-p/2918321#M187</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In what cases we need to select below migration approach?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="MrVmware9423_0-1657623530042.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://communities.vmware.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/96177i3B701C281CE1020C/image-size/medium/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="MrVmware9423_0-1657623530042.png" alt="MrVmware9423_0-1657623530042.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As per pre-requisite if segments needs to be created manually then why we will select this approach we should go with "NSX for vSphere" and select user define topology, Please correct me if I'm wrong....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2022 11:12:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Networking-Members/NSXV-to-2-Distributed-Firewall-Host-and-workload-migration/m-p/2918321#M187</guid>
      <dc:creator>MrVmware9423</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-12T11:12:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NSXV to 2 Distributed Firewall, Host and workload migration</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Networking-Members/NSXV-to-2-Distributed-Firewall-Host-and-workload-migration/m-p/2918324#M188</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This option is for migrating Distributed Firewall rules only from NSX-V to T. Yes, you can use User Define Topology option as well. But it all depends on your use-case/requirement. If you don't want to migration the LS from NSX-V to T, you can go with Distributed Firewall only option. But if you want to migrate LS as well as other services (supported with the option) you can use that option.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2022 11:30:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Networking-Members/NSXV-to-2-Distributed-Firewall-Host-and-workload-migration/m-p/2918324#M188</guid>
      <dc:creator>ShahabKhan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-12T11:30:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

