<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic multiple ways to effectively run profiler ? in Dynamic Environment Manager</title>
    <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Dynamic-Environment-Manager/multiple-ways-to-effectively-run-profiler/m-p/1855526#M3962</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;just curious how most are running the Profiler - as the appstck gets removed after completion .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For small apps i have just been reverting back to clean snapshot and manually reinstalling the app quick .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have some apps that this is impractical however .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are most people attaching their install machines to the domain and then attaching the app stack to the machine ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My manager brought up that maybe we could start an upgrade to an app.. and then while the appstack is attached for a 'fake' upgrade.. quick run the profiler ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could one also just run the profiler While creating the app stack ?.. we put the profiler on all our install machines beforehand.&amp;nbsp; That kinda sounds like a bad idea though.. wouldnt want to add anything 'unwanted' in the recording.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just curious as to how most are capturing the profiler data .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks much .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 23:37:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Douglas42Adams</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-07-31T23:37:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>multiple ways to effectively run profiler ?</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Dynamic-Environment-Manager/multiple-ways-to-effectively-run-profiler/m-p/1855526#M3962</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;just curious how most are running the Profiler - as the appstck gets removed after completion .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For small apps i have just been reverting back to clean snapshot and manually reinstalling the app quick .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have some apps that this is impractical however .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are most people attaching their install machines to the domain and then attaching the app stack to the machine ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My manager brought up that maybe we could start an upgrade to an app.. and then while the appstack is attached for a 'fake' upgrade.. quick run the profiler ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could one also just run the profiler While creating the app stack ?.. we put the profiler on all our install machines beforehand.&amp;nbsp; That kinda sounds like a bad idea though.. wouldnt want to add anything 'unwanted' in the recording.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just curious as to how most are capturing the profiler data .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks much .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 23:37:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Dynamic-Environment-Manager/multiple-ways-to-effectively-run-profiler/m-p/1855526#M3962</guid>
      <dc:creator>Douglas42Adams</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-31T23:37:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

