<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: UAG cookie persistence in Horizon Desktops and Apps</title>
    <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/UAG-cookie-persistence/m-p/2225797#M59786</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have no idea, but I'm guessing since thin clients and possible other can't set cookies because of client restrictions or limitations, cookie persistence won't work. I don't think cookie persistence will work for the display protocols specifically, which are secondary connections I believe. Again this is just me trying to think of reasons.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 18:55:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sjesse</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-02-18T18:55:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>UAG cookie persistence</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/UAG-cookie-persistence/m-p/2225793#M59782</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it is supported using SSL offload in the load balancer for external connections in front of the UAG to be able to use cookie persistence instead of source ip ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2019 11:37:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/UAG-cookie-persistence/m-p/2225793#M59782</guid>
      <dc:creator>dmuligan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-16T11:37:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UAG cookie persistence</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/UAG-cookie-persistence/m-p/2225794#M59783</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are three supported methods for maintaining session affinity with the UAG but cookies is not one of them. Assuming you are using an F5 you should be using the latest Horizon View iApp which will help with UAG configuration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://communities.vmware.com/docs/DOC-32792"&gt;Load Balancing across VMware Unified Access Gateway Appliances&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 05:37:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/UAG-cookie-persistence/m-p/2225794#M59783</guid>
      <dc:creator>BenFB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-18T05:37:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UAG cookie persistence</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/UAG-cookie-persistence/m-p/2225795#M59784</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;B&gt;BenFB&lt;/B&gt;​,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you please help me to understand why session affinity using cookies is not supported ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just trying to understand it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 08:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/UAG-cookie-persistence/m-p/2225795#M59784</guid>
      <dc:creator>dmuligan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-18T08:21:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UAG cookie persistence</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/UAG-cookie-persistence/m-p/2225796#M59785</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why do you specifically need to use cookies? Can you help us understand your architecture and what you are trying to accomplish.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 17:08:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/UAG-cookie-persistence/m-p/2225796#M59785</guid>
      <dc:creator>BenFB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-18T17:08:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UAG cookie persistence</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/UAG-cookie-persistence/m-p/2225797#M59786</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have no idea, but I'm guessing since thin clients and possible other can't set cookies because of client restrictions or limitations, cookie persistence won't work. I don't think cookie persistence will work for the display protocols specifically, which are secondary connections I believe. Again this is just me trying to think of reasons.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 18:55:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/UAG-cookie-persistence/m-p/2225797#M59786</guid>
      <dc:creator>sjesse</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-18T18:55:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UAG cookie persistence</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/UAG-cookie-persistence/m-p/2225798#M59787</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;B&gt;BenFB&lt;/B&gt;​, we cannot use source IP because we have a SNAT rule. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Asking for more public ips for multiple VIP method will take time and multiple ports will not be authorised by security team.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 14:37:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/UAG-cookie-persistence/m-p/2225798#M59787</guid>
      <dc:creator>dmuligan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-19T14:37:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UAG cookie persistence</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/UAG-cookie-persistence/m-p/2225799#M59788</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm assuming you are using an F5 load balancer? Are you using the Horizon View iApp to configure load balancing of the UAG and Connection Servers?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 16:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/UAG-cookie-persistence/m-p/2225799#M59788</guid>
      <dc:creator>BenFB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-19T16:23:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UAG cookie persistence</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/UAG-cookie-persistence/m-p/2225800#M59789</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, it is an open source load balancer, but it could be any other.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any difference using the F5 ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:19:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/UAG-cookie-persistence/m-p/2225800#M59789</guid>
      <dc:creator>dmuligan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-19T17:19:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UAG cookie persistence</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/UAG-cookie-persistence/m-p/2225801#M59790</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #666666; font-family: proxima-nova, Arial, sans-serif;"&gt; public ips for multiple VIP method will take time and multiple ports&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;What are you trying to accomplish. On our f5 we have one external ip, these then point to different pools with the unified access gateways in them, and we only allow 443,8443,4172 though. 80 is a direct redirect to 443, and there are udp and tcp versions of all the ports so the display protocols can do what they need to. I specifically followed the following f5 guide to set up our &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.f5.com/pdf/solution-center/load-balancing-vmware-unified-access-gateway-servers-deployment-guide.pdf" title="https://www.f5.com/pdf/solution-center/load-balancing-vmware-unified-access-gateway-servers-deployment-guide.pdf"&gt;https://www.f5.com/pdf/solution-center/load-balancing-vmware-unified-access-gateway-servers-deployment-guide.pdf&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the only change we made is I have pairs of uags for different purposes so we use an irule to rout traffic to the correct ones.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:34:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/UAG-cookie-persistence/m-p/2225801#M59790</guid>
      <dc:creator>sjesse</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-19T17:34:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UAG cookie persistence</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/UAG-cookie-persistence/m-p/2225802#M59791</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are using an F5 but we have SNAT configured using the Horizon View iApp for our UAG. I know you are using a different load balancer but why is it that SNAT will not work for you?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 03:35:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-Desktops-and-Apps/UAG-cookie-persistence/m-p/2225802#M59791</guid>
      <dc:creator>BenFB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-20T03:35:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

