<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Virtualizing older Mac OS versions—why not max out virtual CPU and RAM settings? in VMware Fusion Discussions</title>
    <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-Fusion-Discussions/Virtualizing-older-Mac-OS-versions-why-not-max-out-virtual-CPU/m-p/2860219#M174993</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I know some people virtualize older OSes with the corresponding hardware of the time order to simulate a specific computer model. In my case, I'm hoping to virtualize bootable backups of old Macs of mine (as well as play around on fresh installations of older OS versions) and I don't care to preserve the experience of the slower hardware specifications of the time but would rather take advantage of my current Mac's power.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I'm not mistaken, when selecting the OS version being installed in VMware Fusion, the settings default to a virtual hardware configuration that more or less match that time period, right? Is there any reason I shouldn't just pump up the CPU cores, RAM, et cetera, to the maximum allowable in the VM settings in order to get the fastest virtualization experience?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does VMware Fusion have a dynamic "Maximum available" VM hardware setting that can either assign the maximum without me needing to specific select it, and/or dynamically adjust based on the available resources (which might change as I open and close applications on my actual computer)? Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2021 19:51:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>iPodShuffle</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-31T19:51:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Virtualizing older Mac OS versions—why not max out virtual CPU and RAM settings?</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-Fusion-Discussions/Virtualizing-older-Mac-OS-versions-why-not-max-out-virtual-CPU/m-p/2860219#M174993</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I know some people virtualize older OSes with the corresponding hardware of the time order to simulate a specific computer model. In my case, I'm hoping to virtualize bootable backups of old Macs of mine (as well as play around on fresh installations of older OS versions) and I don't care to preserve the experience of the slower hardware specifications of the time but would rather take advantage of my current Mac's power.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I'm not mistaken, when selecting the OS version being installed in VMware Fusion, the settings default to a virtual hardware configuration that more or less match that time period, right? Is there any reason I shouldn't just pump up the CPU cores, RAM, et cetera, to the maximum allowable in the VM settings in order to get the fastest virtualization experience?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does VMware Fusion have a dynamic "Maximum available" VM hardware setting that can either assign the maximum without me needing to specific select it, and/or dynamically adjust based on the available resources (which might change as I open and close applications on my actual computer)? Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2021 19:51:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-Fusion-Discussions/Virtualizing-older-Mac-OS-versions-why-not-max-out-virtual-CPU/m-p/2860219#M174993</guid>
      <dc:creator>iPodShuffle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-31T19:51:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Virtualizing older Mac OS versions—why not max out virtual CPU and RAM settings?</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-Fusion-Discussions/Virtualizing-older-Mac-OS-versions-why-not-max-out-virtual-CPU/m-p/2860220#M174994</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You’ll starve your host of resources if you maximise those given to the VM, a better approach is to right-size a VM based on the resources it requires.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2021 20:13:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-Fusion-Discussions/Virtualizing-older-Mac-OS-versions-why-not-max-out-virtual-CPU/m-p/2860220#M174994</guid>
      <dc:creator>scott28tt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-31T20:13:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Virtualizing older Mac OS versions—why not max out virtual CPU and RAM settings?</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-Fusion-Discussions/Virtualizing-older-Mac-OS-versions-why-not-max-out-virtual-CPU/m-p/2860227#M174995</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Two things, selecting the version of the operating system provides compatibility, not performance limitations. &amp;nbsp;Just as newer hardware can't run old OS's, you have to select compatible virtual hardware. &amp;nbsp;That's independent of performance, which a handful of special exceptions (e.g. DOS requires a system clock that matches what the OS expects).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As for resources, the rule of thumb is to never assign more than N-1 cores to the VM, where N is the number of physical (not hyperthreaded) cores. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Likewise, you always want to leave at least 4GB of RAM for the host OS. &amp;nbsp;If you exceed those limits, you'll starve the host for cycles (as Scott said) and actually slow down the whole system. &amp;nbsp;If you're running other things on the host, or are running multiple VM's at once, then you'll want to lower those limits.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As for dynamic, that wouldn't work because just as you can't insert and remove RAM or CPU cores while an OS is running on hardware, you can't do it virtually either.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2021 23:14:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-Fusion-Discussions/Virtualizing-older-Mac-OS-versions-why-not-max-out-virtual-CPU/m-p/2860227#M174995</guid>
      <dc:creator>ColoradoMarmot</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-31T23:14:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

