<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Syslog and DNS on VM--&amp;gt; UDP traffic flood concerns? in Enterprise Strategy &amp; Planning Discussions</title>
    <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Enterprise-Strategy-Planning/Syslog-and-DNS-on-VM-gt-UDP-traffic-flood-concerns/m-p/1568584#M24504</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;To answer your questions from my experience &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A) No&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;B) No &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;C) No. However if your syslog is getting a lot of UDP packets you may want to disable that VM from VMotion, as you may loose a few packets as the networking switches. If its tcp that there will not be loss.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should be easy for you to setup some load tests for your environment, which is the only way you are going to be sure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN __default_attr="10px" __jive_macro_name="size"&gt;&lt;SPAN __default_attr="gray" __jive_macro_name="color"&gt;Considering awarding points if this is of use&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 04:27:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rodos</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-03-26T04:27:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Syslog and DNS on VM--&gt; UDP traffic flood concerns?</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Enterprise-Strategy-Planning/Syslog-and-DNS-on-VM-gt-UDP-traffic-flood-concerns/m-p/1568583#M24503</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are considering converting several physical edge services boxes running DNS and Syslog, from physical to virtual machines. Someone raised a concern regarding the expected volume of small network packets, likely around 1500 (mostly UDP) packets per second. We're on a gig network. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've had a number of vendors steer us away from virtuals in the past due to a high volume of network chatter. HP SIM, for example,monitors thousands of servers via SNMP and the vendor will not certify on VM due to potential network congestion.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My questions are: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A) Is there reason to be concerned with provisioning Syslog/DNS on a virtual, knowing that I'll get ~1500 packets/second?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;B) Is there a 'rule of thumb' or guideline for "acceptable" volume of small network packets on a VM?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;B) Are there any other "gotchas" running Syslog or DNS on a 3.5x VM that anyone is aware of?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for your assistance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:46:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Enterprise-Strategy-Planning/Syslog-and-DNS-on-VM-gt-UDP-traffic-flood-concerns/m-p/1568583#M24503</guid>
      <dc:creator>martinrb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-24T19:46:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Syslog and DNS on VM--&gt; UDP traffic flood concerns?</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Enterprise-Strategy-Planning/Syslog-and-DNS-on-VM-gt-UDP-traffic-flood-concerns/m-p/1568584#M24504</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;To answer your questions from my experience &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A) No&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;B) No &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;C) No. However if your syslog is getting a lot of UDP packets you may want to disable that VM from VMotion, as you may loose a few packets as the networking switches. If its tcp that there will not be loss.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should be easy for you to setup some load tests for your environment, which is the only way you are going to be sure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN __default_attr="10px" __jive_macro_name="size"&gt;&lt;SPAN __default_attr="gray" __jive_macro_name="color"&gt;Considering awarding points if this is of use&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 04:27:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Enterprise-Strategy-Planning/Syslog-and-DNS-on-VM-gt-UDP-traffic-flood-concerns/m-p/1568584#M24504</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rodos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-26T04:27:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Syslog and DNS on VM--&gt; UDP traffic flood concerns?</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Enterprise-Strategy-Planning/Syslog-and-DNS-on-VM-gt-UDP-traffic-flood-concerns/m-p/1568585#M24505</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wouldn't see any problems virtualizing the Syslogs and DNS servers even VMware has paper regarding DNS server under ESX.  &lt;A href="http://www.vmware.com/pdf/file_print_dns_wp.pdf"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you found this information useful, please consider awarding points for "Correct" or "Helpful". Thanks!!! &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stefan Nguyen&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;iGeek Systems LLC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VMware, Citrix, Microsoft Consultant&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:13:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Enterprise-Strategy-Planning/Syslog-and-DNS-on-VM-gt-UDP-traffic-flood-concerns/m-p/1568585#M24505</guid>
      <dc:creator>azn2kew</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-26T17:13:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

