<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is VPC reuqired for  LBT in vSphere™ vNetwork Discussions</title>
    <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vSphere-vNetwork-Discussions/Is-VPC-reuqired-for-LBT/m-p/2282177#M11581</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, it will not work. Route based on physical nic load with both nics active means that a single VM will only be active on a single physical nic at one time. If the load on the physical nic becomes high, one or more VMs will move to a different physical nic and when they move the movement will be announced with gratuitous arps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lars&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 22:48:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>larstr</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-12-09T22:48:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is VPC reuqired for  LBT</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vSphere-vNetwork-Discussions/Is-VPC-reuqired-for-LBT/m-p/2282173#M11577</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I have one host connected with 2 pNIC connected to two different physical switches. Load balancing is LBT and active active for nic failover order. Do I need VPC between those tow physical switches ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="pastedImage_5.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://communities.vmware.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/15880iD918F7C063BEE7C3/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="pastedImage_5.png" alt="pastedImage_5.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 07:03:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vSphere-vNetwork-Discussions/Is-VPC-reuqired-for-LBT/m-p/2282173#M11577</guid>
      <dc:creator>vSohill</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-09T07:03:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is VPC reuqired for  LBT</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vSphere-vNetwork-Discussions/Is-VPC-reuqired-for-LBT/m-p/2282174#M11578</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, you don't need VPC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lars&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 07:27:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vSphere-vNetwork-Discussions/Is-VPC-reuqired-for-LBT/m-p/2282174#M11578</guid>
      <dc:creator>larstr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-09T07:27:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is VPC reuqired for  LBT</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vSphere-vNetwork-Discussions/Is-VPC-reuqired-for-LBT/m-p/2282175#M11579</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;if there is VPC enabled? will this configuration work?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route based on physical nic load with both nics active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 08:06:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vSphere-vNetwork-Discussions/Is-VPC-reuqired-for-LBT/m-p/2282175#M11579</guid>
      <dc:creator>hussainbte</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-09T08:06:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is VPC reuqired for  LBT</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vSphere-vNetwork-Discussions/Is-VPC-reuqired-for-LBT/m-p/2282176#M11580</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Moderator: Moved to vSphere vNetwork&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 08:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vSphere-vNetwork-Discussions/Is-VPC-reuqired-for-LBT/m-p/2282176#M11580</guid>
      <dc:creator>scott28tt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-09T08:19:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is VPC reuqired for  LBT</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vSphere-vNetwork-Discussions/Is-VPC-reuqired-for-LBT/m-p/2282177#M11581</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, it will not work. Route based on physical nic load with both nics active means that a single VM will only be active on a single physical nic at one time. If the load on the physical nic becomes high, one or more VMs will move to a different physical nic and when they move the movement will be announced with gratuitous arps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lars&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 22:48:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vSphere-vNetwork-Discussions/Is-VPC-reuqired-for-LBT/m-p/2282177#M11581</guid>
      <dc:creator>larstr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-09T22:48:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

