VMware Cloud Community
r0j
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

vRealize Lifecycle Manager - Upgrade to vRA 7.6 Fails

Hi All,

Figured would post here before opening a ticket.

When we attempt to upgrade our vRA 7.5 environment, we get the following errors.

___

LCMVRACONFIG50075: vRA upgrade failed.Failed to download ISO file.

Failure: Checking for available updates, this process can take a few minutes... ...................................................... Failure: Error downloading manifest. Please contact your vendor. The requested URL returned error: 502 badgateway URL: https://admin%password@servername:4443/productlinks/vra/7.6.0/upgrade/update/manifest/manifest-lates...

com.vmware.vrealize.lcm.drivers.vra70.exception.FileDownloadException: Failure:

Checking for available updates, this process can take a few minutes...

......................................................

Failure: Error downloading manifest. Please contact your vendor. The requested URL returned error: 502 badgateway URL: https://admin%40localhost:s2enc%password@servernam:4443/productlinks/vra/7.6.0/upgrade/update/manife...

at com.vmware.vrealize.lcm.core.vra70.task.upgrade.VraUpgradeTask.execute(VraUpgradeTask.java:142)

at com.vmware.vrealize.lcm.platform.automata.core.ExecutionTask.run(ExecutionTask.java:41)

at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)

at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)

at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)

___

The vRLCM is in a disconnected state and the upgrade .iso was downloaded manually, then manually copied to the vRLCM appliance via scp, and imported via Settings | Product Support | Product Binaries /  Add Binaries | Local

We were able to successfully upgrade our DEV system using the same binary, so not sure why it is balking at the manifest?

The only thing that changed was we patched our vRLCM to the latest version

Any thoughts from the charming and delightful gentlemen of this community would be appreciated.

Thanks!

Tags (1)
Reply
0 Kudos
0 Replies