I would like to gather opinions on the topic of mutliple vCPU vs cores per socket.
I am trying to determine if you get the same performance from a 2 x vCPU vm VS a 1 x vCPU x 2 cores vm?
Thanks in advance.
There is no difference in performance, only a difference in the presentation to the guest OS.
André
Forum Upgrade Notice:
VMware will be upgrading VMware Communities systems between 10-12 December 2010. During this time, the system will be placed in READ-ONLY mode.
There is no difference in performance, only a difference in the presentation to the guest OS.
André
Forum Upgrade Notice:
VMware will be upgrading VMware Communities systems between 10-12 December 2010. During this time, the system will be placed in READ-ONLY mode.
>I am trying to determine if you get the same performance from a 2 x vCPU vm VS a 1 x vCPU x 2 cores vm?
Absolutely the same. This is just a way to present CPU cores to guest OS / applications for licensing purposes. For example, Windows XP does not allow more than 2 CPUs. By default all cores are presented as multiple CPUs single core each. But if you have 1 quad CPU and you want to give full power to your VM?
Technically in standard SMP system there is no difference for guest OS between multiple CPUs and multiple cores.
---
MCITP: SA+VA, VCP 3/4, VMware vExpert
ok.. thanks i had to check. As we ran a test with 1 proc and 2 cores and could easily peg the cpu with the cpu.vbs script and i was surprised the cpu wasnt just humming at around 70% or so. But completely maxed. But i know the vm will have more threads available.