Just curious if other people have run into issues with the fact that vRA 8.x applies your naming convention to all the disks? Specifically if I want to add a disk to a VM post deployment, the disk being added is named something way off from my VM and vRA puts it in it's own folder in the datastore instead of placing it in the VM folder. Not sure if that's a full on bug, but it seems like a big miss. We're going to end up with disks scattered all over our datastores. Honestly would prefer if vRA didn't name the actual disks using your naming convention. If you deploy a VM manually, when you add disks it's usually more in the convention of "VMname-0001, VMname-0002, etc"