@jen2 wrote:Although the things you wrote are the most ridiculous I have ever read when it comes to IT, I really hope it is true (NOT). But here is a hint, not even kids in primary schools will buy it.
So you are claiming using an old version of encrypting communication of an old branch that is reaching its end of life is not a security risk until proven to the contrary? I really hope you know what you are even talking about.
I really wonder, do you even know what is OpenSSL?
BTW talking in aggressive manner will only prove that you have a weak case and no strong argument!
A volunteer is trying to help and explain what the process is to get this sorted and that's YOUR reaction?
BTW, you can't drop in an openSSL v3 DLL in place of a v1 one as the API is completely different....
--
Wil
