TomekBlaut's Posts

Thank you very much for your precise answer. At the moment, we are not able to purchase a license. Maybe next year, but I am not sure here either. The plan was different, unfortunately, the Vmware l... See more...
Thank you very much for your precise answer. At the moment, we are not able to purchase a license. Maybe next year, but I am not sure here either. The plan was different, unfortunately, the Vmware licensing changed and it turned out as it turned out. Previously, the stretch cluster was available under an advanced license. The servers are linked vSAN with 2 links each 25 GB to the nexus, and there is 40 GB between them, so I think that the performance problem is unlikely to occur. I'm afraid of a power failure in one of the server rooms. I don't know what might happen then. I understand that the machines that happen to be on these hosts will be inaccessible, and will they start to crawl on running. The second thing I fear is the network failure and the cluster will de-synchronic and how will it affect machines and the environment. I know stretch cluster would be the best solution, but I have to manage somehow without it. Or maybe 2 separate clusters.
Hello everyone,  I have a question about vsan. We create a new environment for View, ultimately 1000 vdi - based on Vsan technology consisting of 8 hosts - DELL R740XD vSAN Ready Node located in 2 ... See more...
Hello everyone,  I have a question about vsan. We create a new environment for View, ultimately 1000 vdi - based on Vsan technology consisting of 8 hosts - DELL R740XD vSAN Ready Node located in 2 server rooms in 2 locations, 4 hosts per page. The distance between the server rooms is not great - about 400 meters of connected cisco nexus 9000 - 40 GB, and the hosts themselves are plugged in 25 GB when it comes to vSan connections. We have a vSAN Advanced for Desktop license. I know that the best solution would be a strechcluster, but the license does not allow it. At the moment we have one vSAN cluster configured with 8 hosts. I wanted to ask what error domain should be used to make it resistant to failure of one page - assuming, for example, no power in one of the server rooms. E.g: 1.2 domains with 2 hosts and 4 hosts as Standalone Hosts - with this configuration we have FTT at level 2. 2.4 domains with 2 hosts each - with this configuration we have FTT at level 1. 3.2 domains with 4 hosts each - with this configuration we have FTT at 0 level. How does such a configuration translate into the load on the environment - i.e. when we have options, e.g. options 1 - servers from domains 1 and 2 are working productively, and the rest are waiting for failure? Moreover, I wanted to ask what the best disk policy would be in our case. I assume that for connection servers, e.g. 1 failure - RAID-5 (Erasure Coding), and for vdi 1 failure - RAID-1 (Mirroring). I am asking for suggestions or possibly proposing an appropriate solution for our environment. Have a nice day. 
Hello,  I have on my environment vcenter in version 6.5 and hosts in the same version. I would upgrade vcenter to new version 6.7 and 7.0 U1 but I don't know whether hosts will be work correctly and... See more...
Hello,  I have on my environment vcenter in version 6.5 and hosts in the same version. I would upgrade vcenter to new version 6.7 and 7.0 U1 but I don't know whether hosts will be work correctly and my backup system avamar in version 7.5.101 will be too work. I have looked at compatibility and it looks like hosts in this version will work fine, but I'd rather ask for confirmation. I am afraid that the backup system may stop working, but in compatibility it is more clearly indicated that this version supports hosts up to version 6.7u2, so it's probably okay to upgrade the vcenter version to 7.0U1, and if I upgrade Avamar to version 19 then I'll upgrade to the hosts only. What do you think about such a solution?