Antonythegreatd's Posts

I am open to a NAS, but I thought that was what the windows NFS share was, and it didn't work out.  Is there a better (supported) way/version of NAS you could suggest??  maybe load redhat on the ... See more...
I am open to a NAS, but I thought that was what the windows NFS share was, and it didn't work out.  Is there a better (supported) way/version of NAS you could suggest??  maybe load redhat on the powervault and then present it ... how?  (My storage kung fu is weak, forgive me   )
I need a small economical solution that provides 2-3TB of RAID 5 space, runs on 10gig SPF, and is support for production environments. I had a Dell powervault sharing a NSF share through windo... See more...
I need a small economical solution that provides 2-3TB of RAID 5 space, runs on 10gig SPF, and is support for production environments. I had a Dell powervault sharing a NSF share through windows 2016, but the performance SUCKED, vmotion didn't work, and I could not create new VM's on it.  VM support says it is not a supported or encouraged solution for production. I have a very small (highly critical) environment, so I need something I can work with.  But all I can find are 10K+ solutions with WAY more then I need.  Can anyone suggest another solution or product?
Thank you for the reply!! Still some more; Since you wand to use different VLANs, configure the ports on the Cisco switch as "Trunk" (802.1q) ports, and allow the appropriate VLANs. Done.  So... See more...
Thank you for the reply!! Still some more; Since you wand to use different VLANs, configure the ports on the Cisco switch as "Trunk" (802.1q) ports, and allow the appropriate VLANs. Done.  So no Cisco "Port Group" which is different then the VMware port group. You may then create different port groups on the vSwitch, and configure them with the required VLAN-ID. Perfect, I was worried I couldn't do this, and it was one of my problems. Please note that a port group for the physical switch port's native/default VLAN must not have the VLAN-ID set! Can you be specific, I am not sure what you are talking about here. Under port groups, I have 3; Servers153, Management Network 154, and VM Network 254.  all are explicitly defined on vSwitch0. On the physical Cisco switch, it is a trunk, and assigning a vlan to the trunk makes no sense. With the default settings on the vSwitch, the traffic will be balanced in Round-Robin manner, and fail over to the other vmnic in case of an uplink failure. Perfect TY. In order to allow VMs in different VLANs to communicate with each other you'll need to have routing in place. This can be either a physical, or a virtual router. ESXi itself doesn't provide such an option. Perfect TY!
I have 2 ports for redundancy.  Both are trunked.  I wan the standard config. From a Cisco switch, should I make this a Cisco Port Group?  I think VMware is handling the load balancing, so I ... See more...
I have 2 ports for redundancy.  Both are trunked.  I wan the standard config. From a Cisco switch, should I make this a Cisco Port Group?  I think VMware is handling the load balancing, so I just need to regular trunks, correct??? How would I configure the vSwitch? Anything special if I do not want the different vlan VM's to talk to each other?