franktroeger's Posts

Have you changed the default domain in SSO Config? I have configured it several times but i dont know the bug that you have to put the domain in front of Username. Just for additional domain ... See more...
Have you changed the default domain in SSO Config? I have configured it several times but i dont know the bug that you have to put the domain in front of Username. Just for additional domain Backends, because you can have only one Default. Normally Default is localos but you can configure it.
I am not scared hyperv can challange vmware to fast but for real vmware goes straight microsofts shit way of drop and recreate products any single release. See vsphere 6 comes with new webclie... See more...
I am not scared hyperv can challange vmware to fast but for real vmware goes straight microsofts shit way of drop and recreate products any single release. See vsphere 6 comes with new webclient. if we look back there was all time a web client and it got reworked all time. now we have another waste version 5.x and we all know they have to rework it at all because stay with flash and java .... seriously. I just see 10 years of developement "waste" in the web client and also in vcenter.always just rework and recreate doing mistakes all time again and again. VMware should be aware of the time they need to react on changes in api and documentation with their products and that 3rd party tools cant grow to stable if they change everything every time. Why they waste time in rework a client instead of repair bugs in vaai or storage reclaim or vsan. My keypoint is that microsoft sucks because they never get one piece of software stable, they just shit features not stable for enterprise and not suitable for small enterprise. Same here on vcenter third architecture change in two releases. fist implement and force everyone to sso with or without multiple auth backends and totally shit implementation from rsa. Than rework but still forced use it wothout multiple auth backends but the chance to seperate every features. Now took away chance to split every feature because it is to complicated? What they design a high end enterprise scale solution no one in small enterprise use the features and after this they took away the chance to scale out every component because its to complicated? I am so confused they make design for big enterprise and after this they say deployment simple for small enterprise? In my opinion its just necessary to improve more modular components plain described and go away from "we use inventory service for cache" because thats the point why in 5.5 you cant administer storage in web client they just fake performance with short list views and cache and thats shit i hope 6.0 has a relieable view on the infrastructure in huge environments. i will test it asap but maybe enterprise hypervisor focus on enterprise envirnments and dont try to create solutions for enterprise administered by the room maid. Kind regards
Hard to belive that vmware force his management down to hyper v and ignore all shouts of the community for one complete major release. Just to clarify i love esxi the hypervisor relieable and hi... See more...
Hard to belive that vmware force his management down to hyper v and ignore all shouts of the community for one complete major release. Just to clarify i love esxi the hypervisor relieable and high end technology but this web client is a pain and the customers ignored it in 5.1 and complained about the "performance" 24/7. But vmware does not need to listen and going straight forward in 5.5 and promised better performance. They missed to in fix the performance issues (which is by design with java and flash and this is a known fact since 10 years) wich does not exist in the vic client in the most of my customers environments. Now we are at the stage that you cant belive the vic client because lot of features are not maintained to display stats and settings (like port number of standard switch) of the vsphere version 5.5 and we have an increadible useless for all web client not for use in an enterprise enironment because of the dependency of java, flash, ie security, local admin rights, gpos and all the other security features vmware ignores for one major release. Thank you vmware to close the management tool gap between vmware and hyper v wich is increadible shit. And keep stop listen to the companies below gardner top 100, no one need them!! And by the way i want Maps back, this feature disappeared completely.
glad to hear you solved it without downtime and good to know that simple volume is not a problem
normally i do it online, but to be shure if win 2012 recognize diskspace you should use diskpart to check if win recognize anything. cmd -> diskpart -> list disk -> select disk 0 -> list partiti... See more...
normally i do it online, but to be shure if win 2012 recognize diskspace you should use diskpart to check if win recognize anything. cmd -> diskpart -> list disk -> select disk 0 -> list partition and give output if not you should be careful in addition i recognized that it is a simple volume and contains a 100mb non ntfs partition and system root might be possible that you cant solve this online because you cant convert it into dynamic disk. my solution would be check the diskpart stuff and if you see free space at the end of the simple volume attach the disk to a other vm and try to grow it as a data volume or with a 3rd party disk tool. make shure that there is no snapshot AND that you have a valid backup of your data!
have you done a rescan in the disc manager? The windows wont see the added discspace until you done right click rescan discs. hope this simple trick solves your prob
Hey Stuart, i am vmware Trainer and i have to agree with you. VMware claims Java and Flash are enterprise Ready and Web is the future. But all our customers and most of my students hate the s... See more...
Hey Stuart, i am vmware Trainer and i have to agree with you. VMware claims Java and Flash are enterprise Ready and Web is the future. But all our customers and most of my students hate the slow web client. But it seems that vmware dont listen and claim again like with the licenses on vram that everyone will like it and get a benefit of it. Java and Flash are the biggest cancer in it and thats the future of vmware. I agree microsoft can bring out cheap sluggish software but vmware customers pay for a mercedes and now they get a never used client. Seems that vmware knows better what the customer wants than the customer. like fast clear client to manage paths in storage or maps in a tab of the vsphere client which shows configuration issues. No vmware claim that you just want to click on 5 hyperlinks and wait about one minute each click to see nochting usefull and on top they force users to use this because you cant create vms with actuall vhw level. Sad story, seen this before with novell imanager and sles, novell got a half cooked product and said this is the future. True story. And vmware will never integrate all solutions in the web client like the configuration manager with iis and mssql. the product lifecycle is to short. But np we can wait 6 months to administer all products on new version and 6 additional monts to upgrade everything again.
Hi Folks, i am new in VCM and i use 5.7 in my lab environment. Everything seems to work as designed like import maschines and i have one win 7 and one win2008r2 for testing beside my win2008r2 ... See more...
Hi Folks, i am new in VCM and i use 5.7 in my lab environment. Everything seems to work as designed like import maschines and i have one win 7 and one win2008r2 for testing beside my win2008r2 vcm host. But now i wanted to install winscp and i used package tool to deploy in the default https://vcmserver/softwarerepository and after this one fails with a tls error i created a new repository on win 2008r2 without https but i receive following errors in my package manager log: <attached logfile> Any help would be appreciated. Thank you