Hi Mike, I'll take a stab at these: 1) Templates are supported in SRM GA. 2) Agreed, per-VM IP configuration can be quite burdensome, so having a flat address space between prot...
See more...
Hi Mike, I'll take a stab at these: 1) Templates are supported in SRM GA. 2) Agreed, per-VM IP configuration can be quite burdensome, so having a flat address space between protected site and recovery site would definitely be a win. 3) The disadvantage of putting placeholder VMs on local storage is that it restricts SRM to powering the VM on on the specific host. With shared storage, SRM will use DRS recommendations to power on a VM on the most appropriate (lightest loaded) host. That said, if you know exactly on which host you want the VM powered on then using local storage is fine. 4) Being able to override timeouts per-VM timeouts is a good idea. A workaround is to provide a post-power-on callout script that waits for the essential services on the VM to start. This has the advantage of verifying that the specific services (rather than just the VM) are up. 5) The repair arrays button allows you to re-configure the recovery-side arrays from the recovery side if the primary site is down, as with an actual disaster. In other words, the normal flow is to configure both arrays from the protected side, but if the protected side is a smoking crater you may still want to fiddle with your recovery side array config. 6) Powering-off of VMs during the failback workflow is about maximizing the chances of getting a consistent copy back at Site A. If you are not reversing the direction of replication or you don't care about data written at Site B or you are doing synchronous replication back to Site A then you may not need to power off the VMs at Site B. Thanks, -Alvin