No offense was taken. I just wanted to clarify since I think that my subject was a bit unclear.

And as a matter a fact, I owe you a bit of thanks -- if you hadn't looked at my post and helped to affirm that there were issues with the WSDL, I might still be spinning my wheels trying to figure out how to address the problem. But as it is, our exchanged helped me come up with a solution that works for the time being (albeit a bit hackish). So I do appreciate your time :).

I will open a bug report as you suggested and hopefully a new WSDL will be out soon and I can go back into our codebase and refactor it to use the newer methods as recommended.

Thanks,

kphan