- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Fusion vs Parallels long time fusion user
I have been using VMware Fusion for many years now. I just bought an m2 Mac and am at a crossroads. I read that Parallels is currently the only Microsoft approved virtualization for Windows. This makes me a little hesitant to upgrade fusion. Thoughts? I am not a huge fan of the Parallels licensing. However, they are recognized. I have a limited budget so I am trying to decide.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Just because Parallels got an early start on Microsoft "recognition" doesn't mean that Windows 11 ARM doesn't work well on Fusion. Windows 11 ARM works fine on Fusion 13 with Apple Silicon. If you use the information and tools noted n the unofficial Companion guide, it's pretty easy to install.
There are three exceptions where Parallels is ahead of VMware, two of which are likely to be non-issues in a relatively short timeline.
- From what we hear, VMware is working on the same "approval" from Microsoft that Parallels has. This is likely to be a non-issue in the near future.
- Fusion doesn't have a full implementation of VMware Tools so things such as copy/paste/drag/drop and shared folders aren't there yet. The shared folders can be worked around fairly easily. These too are expected to be a non-issue in the near future.
- Parallels also claims macOS virtualization that Fusion doesn't. A Parallels macOS virtual machine on Apple Silicon doesn't have the same functionality as their Windows or Linux virtual machines - that's because they've just put a coat of paint on Apple's Virtualization Framework sample code. And oh, by the way, you can pay zero, nada, zilch, bupkis $0 for Virtual Buddy or UTM and get the same functionality for macOS virtualization that you'd have to pay Parallels for.
The price point is even better if you are using Fusion for non-commercial purposes. Free for Fusion, Free for UTM. You can look up what you'd pay Parallels for for the same features. Per year. It's a lot more than $0.
Editor of the Unofficial Fusion Companion Guides
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I'll just add a couple of thoughts more specifically - we expect a new tech preview version of Fusion "soon" that'll have full support. Once we have that, I plan to retire my Parallels license I bought as a bridge and use Fusion exclusively. I find it to be by far the more stable and user-friendly virtualization solution.
I'll echo the suggestion - use the current free version for now (and use the Unofficial guide pinned in the documents section of the forum to build your windows VM). Then when the tech preview comes out, upgrade to that.
And run that for a while, for free. If it meets your needs, then you have your answer.