I have been using VMware Fusion for many years now. I just bought an m2 Mac and am at a crossroads. I read that Parallels is currently the only Microsoft approved virtualization for Windows. This makes me a little hesitant to upgrade fusion. Thoughts? I am not a huge fan of the Parallels licensing. However, they are recognized. I have a limited budget so I am trying to decide.
Just because Parallels got an early start on Microsoft "recognition" doesn't mean that Windows 11 ARM doesn't work well on Fusion. Windows 11 ARM works fine on Fusion 13 with Apple Silicon. If you use the information and tools noted n the unofficial Companion guide, it's pretty easy to install.
There are three exceptions where Parallels is ahead of VMware, two of which are likely to be non-issues in a relatively short timeline.
The price point is even better if you are using Fusion for non-commercial purposes. Free for Fusion, Free for UTM. You can look up what you'd pay Parallels for for the same features. Per year. It's a lot more than $0.
I'll just add a couple of thoughts more specifically - we expect a new tech preview version of Fusion "soon" that'll have full support. Once we have that, I plan to retire my Parallels license I bought as a bridge and use Fusion exclusively. I find it to be by far the more stable and user-friendly virtualization solution.
I'll echo the suggestion - use the current free version for now (and use the Unofficial guide pinned in the documents section of the forum to build your windows VM). Then when the tech preview comes out, upgrade to that.
And run that for a while, for free. If it meets your needs, then you have your answer.
