VMware Cloud Community
bobst_martin
Contributor
Contributor

drivers for SAN on esx3.0

hello all,

i'm using a SAN with clariion cx400/600 and PowerPath is not available for VMWare, only for "regular linux". so I have only failover path and no load balancing (for 1 LUN)

what about the other SAN Storage ? HDS, NetApps, HP, IBM, PILLAR, ...

IBM (commercials) answer me that I can install "drivers for SVC" without trouble, and then I wil have load balancing, and I don't lost "support" from VMWare, is it right ? is it same for other storage ?

thanks for your feed back.

HB

Reply
0 Kudos
6 Replies
AMcCreath
Commander
Commander

PowerPath is not requried as ESX has it' own MultiPath utility. By nature the CX range does NOT load balance, it is an active/standby configuration. Only when you use SYMMETRIX do you get activ/active load balanced SANs.

You can install Navisphere on ESX if you need though (see link below)

https://powerlink.emc.com/nsepn/webapps/btg548664833igtcuup4826/km/live1/en_US/Offering_Technical/Te...

Reply
0 Kudos
kkorasak
Contributor
Contributor

Bonjour Martin,

When using ESX, you do not need to install PowerPath. Multipathing is installed "by default" with ESX. On the other hand, you do not have load-balancing just the failover between the 2 hba's.

It is the same with other SAN vendors.

Kang

Reply
0 Kudos
kkorasak
Contributor
Contributor

of course Navisphere agent (Linux) can be installed on ESX to communicate with your Clariion.

Reply
0 Kudos
bobst_martin
Contributor
Contributor

I don't agree with you, I have load balancing between 2 hba on my cx600 with powerpath on windows servers.

windows with 2 hba : 6 paths, 3 active 3 stand bye

ESX with 2 hba : 6 paths, 1 active 5 stand bye

IO on VM windows is 3 times lower than non VM windows, because 1 path is full instead of 3 paths full

I'm not speaking about naviagent to register manually or automatic, this is not the question, and it work well.

I'm really speaking about IO between ESX and VMFS

I don't want also RAW device, because I need to move from ESX #1 to ESX # 2, and only raw device mapping is supported, so VMFS is the slower point.

Reply
0 Kudos
bobst_martin
Contributor
Contributor

Bonjour Martin,

.....

It is the same with other SAN vendors.

Kang

whaou, what a pity, thanks

Reply
0 Kudos
Security_Financ
Contributor
Contributor

You can create multiple LUNs and denote each path as active for different paths. This allows you to take advantage of all paths if you array supports it.

Tom

Reply
0 Kudos