Hi,
The maximum number of virtual machines over a datastore iSCSI/SAN to have a good performance is between 10 or 15 it. Is it the same over a datastore NFS?
Thanks.
Alot depends on your storage subsystem. The recommended for vmfs volumes on FC or iscsi is still in the 10-15 range because scsi reservations happen at the lun level causing the entire volume to freeze for a second (or less)
With NFS, the locking is at the file level so you can scale much higher. I've talked to netapp engineers who are running a full disk aggregate on 15k disk and they are not seeing performance issues running 50-80 VM's on a single NFS mount...
Of course that totally depends on the type of VM you have too.
really that is a target it all depends on the what type of disk load the vms put on the datastore, the load on the network - so its diffifcult to say -
Don't think so considering NFS doesn't have the same performance...
By default you can only have 8 stores at a time and I'd stick with that rule. You can bump it up by going into your Configuration and then Advanced Settings (under NFS). Absolute max is 32...
FYI - I heard that NetApp has some good NFS devices that can compete with iSCSI SAN's for performance.
Alot depends on your storage subsystem. The recommended for vmfs volumes on FC or iscsi is still in the 10-15 range because scsi reservations happen at the lun level causing the entire volume to freeze for a second (or less)
With NFS, the locking is at the file level so you can scale much higher. I've talked to netapp engineers who are running a full disk aggregate on 15k disk and they are not seeing performance issues running 50-80 VM's on a single NFS mount...
Of course that totally depends on the type of VM you have too.