Seems that there isn't a uniprocessor version:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2008.03.kernel.aspx?pr=blog
One of the low-level changes to the system is that Windows Server 2008 only includes a version of the kernel designed to work on multiprocessor systems. In the past, Windows used a version specific to uniprocessors on machines with a single CPU because that version could achieve slightly better performance by omitting the synchronization code required only in multiprocessor environments. As hardware has become faster, the performance benefit of the optimizations has become negligible, and most server systems today include more than one processor, making a uniprocessor version unnecessary.
Andre
It should be the same procedure still using Device Manager.
If you found this information useful, please consider awarding points for "Correct" or "Helpful". Thanks!!!
Regards,
Stefan Nguyen
VMware vExpert 2009
iGeek Systems Inc.
VMware, Citrix, Microsoft Consultant
Windows running on 1 CPU with multiprocessor kernel loses some percents of CPU performance. Are you so concerned about these percents?
---
VMware vExpert '2009
My server only shows ACPI x64 Based PC. Not Uni- or Multi-processor.
Is this still needed in 2008?
-Arnim van Lieshout
-
Blogging: http://www.van-lieshout.com
If you find this information useful, please award points for "correct" or "helpful".
Seems that there isn't a uniprocessor version:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2008.03.kernel.aspx?pr=blog
One of the low-level changes to the system is that Windows Server 2008 only includes a version of the kernel designed to work on multiprocessor systems. In the past, Windows used a version specific to uniprocessors on machines with a single CPU because that version could achieve slightly better performance by omitting the synchronization code required only in multiprocessor environments. As hardware has become faster, the performance benefit of the optimizations has become negligible, and most server systems today include more than one processor, making a uniprocessor version unnecessary.
Andre
Thanks for the info Andre. Didn't know that.
-Arnim van Lieshout
-
Blogging: http://www.van-lieshout.com
If you find this information useful, please award points for "correct" or "helpful".