VMware Cloud Community
mfair
Contributor
Contributor
Jump to solution

new 2TB LUN for VMFS, VC only sees 97.99GB free space

I have a new CLARiiON CX3-40F that I am going to be migrating my VM's to. (very thankful for SVMotion, and the SVMotion VC add-in found here works quite nicely)

I have created several 1TB LUNS for vmfs, (full 4+1 raid groups on 300GB drives). These all show up in the Add Storage Wizard as they should, 1.05TB capacity, 1.05TB available.

I have also created 2 - 2TB LUNS for vmfs (full 8+1 raid groups on 300GB drives). These show up as 2.10TB capacity, 97.99GB available. What did I do wrong?

Mike

0 Kudos
1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
Texiwill
Leadership
Leadership
Jump to solution

Hello,

2.10 TBs is greater than 2TBs. It has to be 2TBs or less, nothing greater.


Best regards,

Edward L. Haletky

VMware Communities User Moderator

====

Author of the book 'VMWare ESX Server in the Enterprise: Planning and Securing Virtualization Servers', Copyright 2008 Pearson Education.

CIO Virtualization Blog: http://www.cio.com/blog/index/topic/168354

As well as the Virtualization Wiki at http://www.astroarch.com/wiki/index.php/Virtualization

--
Edward L. Haletky
vExpert XIV: 2009-2023,
VMTN Community Moderator
vSphere Upgrade Saga: https://www.astroarch.com/blogs
GitHub Repo: https://github.com/Texiwill

View solution in original post

0 Kudos
3 Replies
Texiwill
Leadership
Leadership
Jump to solution

Hello,

2.10 TBs is greater than 2TBs. It has to be 2TBs or less, nothing greater.


Best regards,

Edward L. Haletky

VMware Communities User Moderator

====

Author of the book 'VMWare ESX Server in the Enterprise: Planning and Securing Virtualization Servers', Copyright 2008 Pearson Education.

CIO Virtualization Blog: http://www.cio.com/blog/index/topic/168354

As well as the Virtualization Wiki at http://www.astroarch.com/wiki/index.php/Virtualization

--
Edward L. Haletky
vExpert XIV: 2009-2023,
VMTN Community Moderator
vSphere Upgrade Saga: https://www.astroarch.com/blogs
GitHub Repo: https://github.com/Texiwill
0 Kudos
mcowger
Immortal
Immortal
Jump to solution

Indeed - if its over 2TB, it will only show the space > than 2TB, or .1TB (aka 99.99 GB that you see).

--Matt

--Matt VCDX #52 blog.cowger.us
mfair
Contributor
Contributor
Jump to solution

ahhhhh I see it now. I read the specs too quickly. I saw the 64TB limit, didn't realize that it meant 2TB with bunch of extents.

Is the any harm in carving that 2.1TB raid group into 2 - 1+TB LUNS for VMFS or should I leave it as one volume and burn the 100GB?

Thanks for the help,

Mike

0 Kudos