VMware Cloud Community
regnak2012
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Jump to solution

vSphere 6.0 hardening guide - What happened?!

Hi,

I've been using the Hardening Guides for a number of years and just opened the version 6.0 one to discover significant changes are afoot?!!

The Guide is no longer broken down into Tabs according to technology Area (ESXi, VM, vCenter, SSO etc) but they are all in a list. That's ok but many are missing. There's a second document which provides more settings but....points you to the VMware Documentation. So I no longer have a single document to audit my environment against....

What happened and why has the approach changed?

I'm trying not to be cynical and say VMware want to make it harder for you so you buy Configuration Manager, but this makes a tedious job much, much harder than it needs to be.

Any comments or am I missing something?

Regards,

Mike

0 Kudos
1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
mikefoley
VMware Employee
VMware Employee
Jump to solution

The changes were blogged about starting back in Feb. I solicited feedback for months. Please read the blog articles for the "Why".

http://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/2015/02/vsphere-6-0-hardening-guide-overview-coming-changes.html

https://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/2015/06/vsphere-6-hardening-guide-ga-now-available.html

mike

mike

View solution in original post

0 Kudos
2 Replies
mikefoley
VMware Employee
VMware Employee
Jump to solution

The changes were blogged about starting back in Feb. I solicited feedback for months. Please read the blog articles for the "Why".

http://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/2015/02/vsphere-6-0-hardening-guide-overview-coming-changes.html

https://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/2015/06/vsphere-6-hardening-guide-ga-now-available.html

mike

mike

0 Kudos
Jimmy15
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Jump to solution

only 75 objects are considered and only VM,Network and ESXi objects are mentioned rather then covering VC,VUM,SSO etc. Justification to make a single PDF,CSV etc is also not clear.

Pankaj Sharma


regards



PS: Mark kudos or correct answer as appropriate 🙂
0 Kudos