VMware Cloud Community
AlbertWT
Virtuoso
Virtuoso
Jump to solution

SQL Server 2008 redundancies, OS level or Hypervisor level ?

Hi All,
At the moment I'd like to combine my departmental SQL Server into one big SQL Server 2008 instances spread across two servers (for redundancy reason).
How/what is the best way to approach this ?
is it through clustering or Log shipping or VMware (hypervisor) High Availability features ?
Note: this DB server cannot go down as it is hosting the VCenter DB and also server monitoring database too.
Any suggestion and comment would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
/* Please feel free to provide any comments or input you may have. */
Tags (1)
0 Kudos
1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
AndreTheGiant
Immortal
Immortal
Jump to solution

VMware HA does not protect the single service and it could need some minutes to restart your VM.

If this delay it's ok, then go with this.

Otherwise you must use Microsoft Fail-over Cluster.

Andre

Andrew | http://about.me/amauro | http://vinfrastructure.it/ | @Andrea_Mauro

View solution in original post

0 Kudos
7 Replies
AlbertWT
Virtuoso
Virtuoso
Jump to solution

At the moment the SQL Server is spread across several smaller servers 3-4 SQL Server 2000 and 2005 with the total of 70 DB inside those servers, what I'd like to do/build is to migrate them all into SQL Server 2008 in which I must make it redundant so that if one server failed for whatever reason, the other instance can just pick it up straight away.
so from several smaller SQL Servers, I want to consolidate them all into one more powerful SQL Server 2008 x64.
but so far don't know which technology that is suitable for that or if it is possible to do in SQL Serve 2008 Standard.
/* Please feel free to provide any comments or input you may have. */
0 Kudos
eeg3
Commander
Commander
Jump to solution

HA by itself will provide a modest level of redundancy compared to other options, but you'll still have the downtime when the VM is restarting on another host; HA doesn't depend on vCenter (and subsequently its DB). Also, if you can get by with one vCPU performance-wise, using Fault Tolerance seems like a possible approach.

Blog: http://blog.eeg3.net
AlbertWT
Virtuoso
Virtuoso
Jump to solution

Yes, that is why I didn't put FT into the list of possbile solution, so I was just wondering if I can just set the big SQL Server 2008x64 Std. VM as single instance and then make it HA enabled to cater my above requirement ?

cmiiw.

/* Please feel free to provide any comments or input you may have. */
0 Kudos
AndreTheGiant
Immortal
Immortal
Jump to solution

VMware HA does not protect the single service and it could need some minutes to restart your VM.

If this delay it's ok, then go with this.

Otherwise you must use Microsoft Fail-over Cluster.

Andre

Andrew | http://about.me/amauro | http://vinfrastructure.it/ | @Andrea_Mauro
0 Kudos
AlbertWT
Virtuoso
Virtuoso
Jump to solution

Ah, so in this case HA mirroring is enough for me as long as the server not losing any data significantly.

the reason why I am asking is to know what are my options.

CHeers,

AWT

/* Please feel free to provide any comments or input you may have. */
0 Kudos
AlbertWT
Virtuoso
Virtuoso
Jump to solution

ok, here's that I'd like to implement:

ESX1:
VM1: Windows Server 2008 Standard + SQL Server 2008 Standard (RDM into the SAN) - clustering mirror

ESX2:
VM2: Windows Server 2008 Standard + SQL Server 2008 Standard (RDM into the same SAN LUN as above) - clustering mirror

any comments are welcome.

/* Please feel free to provide any comments or input you may have. */
0 Kudos
JPK871
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Jump to solution

Here's a really good discussion I've run across with the same basic questions:

http://blog.scottlowe.org/2011/04/18/design-question-from-a-reader/