ESXi

 View Only
  • 1.  Server disk datastore vs SAN Datastore?

    Posted Dec 09, 2011 01:51 AM

    I just got the SAN hooked up to the VM. I have about 3 TB of Datastore on the server itself and about 6 TB on the SAN.  I have the following questions.

    1. The SAN is faster, more reliable, more redundant?

    2. Of my less critcal servers I should put them maybe on the Server's datastore?

    3. Don't use the Server's datastores at all?

    thanks



  • 2.  RE: Server disk datastore vs SAN Datastore?
    Best Answer

    Posted Dec 09, 2011 02:37 AM

    Hi.

    1. SAN is usually faster, more reliable and redundant assuming that it is configured well.

    2. Local storage is not shared so DRS/HA will not work.  If you don't use/need those features then yeah that would work.

    3. Really depends on your requirements.  You can always put things like ISOs on local storage.



  • 3.  RE: Server disk datastore vs SAN Datastore?

    Posted Dec 09, 2011 04:40 AM

    2)  Not only will DRS/HA no work, but if you lose that server's disks, you lose all the VMs on it, permanently.



  • 4.  RE: Server disk datastore vs SAN Datastore?

    Posted Dec 09, 2011 04:02 AM

    Also be aware if you are using ESXi 4 you can only access datastores that are 2 TB -512 B in size - so you will have to present your storage in chunks equal to or smaller than that size.