Fault Tolerance sounds good, but I am assuming that there is a performance penalty to using it. This statement from the FT page makes me think that it is not a recommended best practice to keep it on as an alternative to local MSCS type clustering:
+Applications that require continuous protection during certain critical
periods of time such as quarter end processing, can utilize VMware
Fault Tolerance for higher assurance of availability during those time
periods.+
What are the best practices around it's use?
What have beta testers found in using it?
-MattG
Just saw this:
VMware Fault Tolerance is supported with virtual machines with only a single virtual processor.
That could hamper it's use for the type of VMs (Exchange, SQL) that you want this type of HA for.
-MattG
Maybe in 4.1, 4.2, or 4.5 whatever they call it.
Jase McCarty
Co-Author of VMware ESX Essentials in the Virtual Data Center
(ISBN:1420070274) from Auerbach
Please consider awarding points if this post was helpful or correct
I think FT is excellent for all the custom solutions a lot of customer build which are mostly not cluster aware. Especially in the Insurance and banking industry you will see a lot of these applications. They don't typically use a lot of resources or need vSMP but they are business critical.
Duncan
VMware Communities User Moderator
-
If you find this information useful, please award points for "correct" or "helpful".
Duncan,
You hit the nail on the head. Working in the finance industry, there are a lot of systems that could benefit from this. I can think of many systems I would like use FT with.
Too bad my 6 month old, and 1 year old DL580 G5's have 7300 series processors. I'll be sure to get some 7400 series procs this go around.
Jase McCarty
Co-Author of VMware ESX Essentials in the Virtual Data Center
(ISBN:1420070274) from Auerbach
Please consider awarding points if this post was helpful or correct
So there is a processor architecture minimum requirement?
-MattG