<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NSX-V multiple external subnets and routing in Networking Members</title>
    <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Networking-Members/NSX-V-multiple-external-subnets-and-routing/m-p/2968584#M321</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I think there is a limitation in NSX if using a default gateway. The Option that i&amp;nbsp; think insted of using a default gateway you can have static routes. This however will require an NSX-V edge to be connected to more than one Uplink. Although static routes will still be based on the destination network only you have less control on where the source traffic gets routed&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2023 17:25:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>alumbwage</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-15T17:25:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NSX-V multiple external subnets and routing</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Networking-Members/NSX-V-multiple-external-subnets-and-routing/m-p/2966418#M302</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Can I somehow specify which internal network behind edge should go out on a specific external network.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;as both external subnets have different default gateways.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;There is only one setting on Default Gateway under "Routes"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2023 10:08:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Networking-Members/NSX-V-multiple-external-subnets-and-routing/m-p/2966418#M302</guid>
      <dc:creator>patriccc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-02T10:08:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NSX-V multiple external subnets and routing</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Networking-Members/NSX-V-multiple-external-subnets-and-routing/m-p/2966895#M309</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There are limited options and we need to leveeage this option&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;on Default Gateway under "Routes"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2023 21:27:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Networking-Members/NSX-V-multiple-external-subnets-and-routing/m-p/2966895#M309</guid>
      <dc:creator>Akshat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-04T21:27:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NSX-V multiple external subnets and routing</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Networking-Members/NSX-V-multiple-external-subnets-and-routing/m-p/2968584#M321</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think there is a limitation in NSX if using a default gateway. The Option that i&amp;nbsp; think insted of using a default gateway you can have static routes. This however will require an NSX-V edge to be connected to more than one Uplink. Although static routes will still be based on the destination network only you have less control on where the source traffic gets routed&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2023 17:25:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Networking-Members/NSX-V-multiple-external-subnets-and-routing/m-p/2968584#M321</guid>
      <dc:creator>alumbwage</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-15T17:25:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

