<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic UEM Still Needed with Writable? in Dynamic Environment Manager</title>
    <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Dynamic-Environment-Manager/UEM-Still-Needed-with-Writable/m-p/1410080#M2777</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a situation and trying to figure out the best method moving forward so any input would be greatly appreciated.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A little background.&amp;nbsp; I have recently upgraded to the below versions to better support O365 and Windows 10.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;App Vol 2.14, UEM 9.5, Horizon 7.6.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With the recent deployment of O365 it was recommended to give all users Writable Profiles because of the need to enable Outlook caching.&amp;nbsp; This allows it to cache only the first time.&amp;nbsp; I leveraged UEM quite a lot but not sure it's needed anymore.&amp;nbsp; Looking for some advice on how I should still use UEM.&amp;nbsp; Will there be a conflict if both are used?&amp;nbsp; Should I remove my applications in UEM since the application data will now be backed up with the writable profile?&amp;nbsp; If you have used Writable volumes before then you know they have to be deleted sometimes due to weird issues which then loses all of the users data.&amp;nbsp; I'm thinking that UEM would be handy in that case since it will have all of the IE cache and application stuff saved with the roaming profile.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 15:34:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gpenunuri</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-12-12T15:34:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>UEM Still Needed with Writable?</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Dynamic-Environment-Manager/UEM-Still-Needed-with-Writable/m-p/1410080#M2777</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a situation and trying to figure out the best method moving forward so any input would be greatly appreciated.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A little background.&amp;nbsp; I have recently upgraded to the below versions to better support O365 and Windows 10.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;App Vol 2.14, UEM 9.5, Horizon 7.6.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With the recent deployment of O365 it was recommended to give all users Writable Profiles because of the need to enable Outlook caching.&amp;nbsp; This allows it to cache only the first time.&amp;nbsp; I leveraged UEM quite a lot but not sure it's needed anymore.&amp;nbsp; Looking for some advice on how I should still use UEM.&amp;nbsp; Will there be a conflict if both are used?&amp;nbsp; Should I remove my applications in UEM since the application data will now be backed up with the writable profile?&amp;nbsp; If you have used Writable volumes before then you know they have to be deleted sometimes due to weird issues which then loses all of the users data.&amp;nbsp; I'm thinking that UEM would be handy in that case since it will have all of the IE cache and application stuff saved with the roaming profile.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 15:34:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Dynamic-Environment-Manager/UEM-Still-Needed-with-Writable/m-p/1410080#M2777</guid>
      <dc:creator>gpenunuri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-12T15:34:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

