<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: bridge101 interfering with resolving .local addresses in VMware Fusion Discussions</title>
    <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-Fusion-Discussions/bridge101-interfering-with-resolving-local-addresses/m-p/2946134#M181102</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The same problem was happening with Fusion Pro 12. I upgraded to 13 to see if the problem would go away.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Intel Macbook Pro running the latest version of Monterey.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2022 18:15:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jimsold</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-12-31T18:15:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>bridge101 interfering with resolving .local addresses</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-Fusion-Discussions/bridge101-interfering-with-resolving-local-addresses/m-p/2946133#M181101</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am setting up some raspberry pis. I want to use &amp;lt;hostname&amp;gt;.local to access them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This works reliably when&amp;nbsp; Fusion is NOT running.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When Fusion is running, even with no open VMs, the bridge interface bridge101 appears. Then pretty soon, I get incomplete arp cache reported routes like:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;```&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;petermirror.fios-router.home (192.168.1.220) at b8:27:eb:23:d4:b3 on en0 ifscope [ethernet]&lt;BR /&gt;petermirror.fios-router.home (192.168.1.220) at (incomplete) on bridge101 ifscope [bridge]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;```&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Pi (petermirror) has the local IP as shown but if the incomplete line appears when I run arp -a then the ,local address will not resolve. ssh to petermirror just hangs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jim&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2022 18:06:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-Fusion-Discussions/bridge101-interfering-with-resolving-local-addresses/m-p/2946133#M181101</guid>
      <dc:creator>jimsold</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-31T18:06:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: bridge101 interfering with resolving .local addresses</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-Fusion-Discussions/bridge101-interfering-with-resolving-local-addresses/m-p/2946134#M181102</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The same problem was happening with Fusion Pro 12. I upgraded to 13 to see if the problem would go away.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Intel Macbook Pro running the latest version of Monterey.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2022 18:15:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-Fusion-Discussions/bridge101-interfering-with-resolving-local-addresses/m-p/2946134#M181102</guid>
      <dc:creator>jimsold</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-31T18:15:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: bridge101 interfering with resolving .local addresses</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-Fusion-Discussions/bridge101-interfering-with-resolving-local-addresses/m-p/2946136#M181103</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It happened again just now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But I have a workaround. Use:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;```&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ssh -b 192.168.1.1 &lt;A href="mailto:mirror@petermirror.local" target="_blank"&gt;mirror@petermirror.local&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;```&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The .1.1 address is the local gateway. bridge101 identifies as 192.168.135.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When the ssh failure happens when not using -b, adding the -b parameter allows ssh to complete. I can let VMware Fusion be running in the background.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2022 18:48:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-Fusion-Discussions/bridge101-interfering-with-resolving-local-addresses/m-p/2946136#M181103</guid>
      <dc:creator>jimsold</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-31T18:48:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: bridge101 interfering with resolving .local addresses</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-Fusion-Discussions/bridge101-interfering-with-resolving-local-addresses/m-p/2946144#M181104</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Well, the -b option is not 100% reliable. I had to quit Fusion again to get the ssh connection to work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Curious why this is happening.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2022 19:38:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-Fusion-Discussions/bridge101-interfering-with-resolving-local-addresses/m-p/2946144#M181104</guid>
      <dc:creator>jimsold</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-31T19:38:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: bridge101 interfering with resolving .local addresses</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-Fusion-Discussions/bridge101-interfering-with-resolving-local-addresses/m-p/2946197#M181109</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;WiFi and Fusion has not been reliable in Fusion 12. &amp;nbsp;I have seen macOS updates improve the situation so I will concede it may not be a problem VMware can solve. &amp;nbsp;If you have one, and a wired network, try adding a USB to Ethernet to the MacBook Pro and see if things get better.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2023 19:34:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-Fusion-Discussions/bridge101-interfering-with-resolving-local-addresses/m-p/2946197#M181109</guid>
      <dc:creator>gringley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-01T19:34:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

