<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ESX3.5 Managed by VC 2.5 Across Gigabit MAN in vCenter™ Server Discussions</title>
    <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vCenter-Server-Discussions/ESX3-5-Managed-by-VC-2-5-Across-Gigabit-MAN/m-p/2469766#M81372</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the quick reply.  Just for my own information, do you do any advanced functions (i.e. DRS, HA, VMotion) on your VC for the remote ESX hosts?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:33:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rgv75</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-10T20:33:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ESX3.5 Managed by VC 2.5 Across Gigabit MAN</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vCenter-Server-Discussions/ESX3-5-Managed-by-VC-2-5-Across-Gigabit-MAN/m-p/2469764#M81370</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We currently have two sites, one is our headquarters and the other is our remote data center.  I have a VC managing ESX 3.5 servers at our remote data center.  I also have a stand-alone ESX located at HQ.  I have enough licenses where I can have the ESX located at HQ to be managed by our VC at the data center.  I don't plan to do any vMotion or DRS on the HQ ESX, because I plan to create a new Datacenter in VC to manage this single ESX host.  My goal is to just use VC Update Manager on this single ESX host located at HQ and use a centralized license server for all ESX hosts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone see any problem with this?  Or, should I just build a VC at our headquarters and have that VC manage this single ESX host.  (I don't want to use ESXupdate.)  I don't foresee that we will be having a 2nd ESX host at our HQ.  It only has a domain controller for local authentication, print server, and our antivirus server.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for help and I appreciate any feedback.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;rgv&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:53:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vCenter-Server-Discussions/ESX3-5-Managed-by-VC-2-5-Across-Gigabit-MAN/m-p/2469764#M81370</guid>
      <dc:creator>rgv75</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-10T19:53:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ESX3.5 Managed by VC 2.5 Across Gigabit MAN</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vCenter-Server-Discussions/ESX3-5-Managed-by-VC-2-5-Across-Gigabit-MAN/m-p/2469765#M81371</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should be okay as long as the firewalls are setup to allow the traffic.  We've got VC managing hosts at multiple locations.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just saw a sales presentation from Lefthand Networks where they have set up a more elaborate VMware infrastructure in Florida where the 2 data centers are 37 KM apart and in DC where the data centers are 6 blocks apart.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:15:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vCenter-Server-Discussions/ESX3-5-Managed-by-VC-2-5-Across-Gigabit-MAN/m-p/2469765#M81371</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikepodoherty</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-10T20:15:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ESX3.5 Managed by VC 2.5 Across Gigabit MAN</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vCenter-Server-Discussions/ESX3-5-Managed-by-VC-2-5-Across-Gigabit-MAN/m-p/2469766#M81372</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the quick reply.  Just for my own information, do you do any advanced functions (i.e. DRS, HA, VMotion) on your VC for the remote ESX hosts?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:33:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vCenter-Server-Discussions/ESX3-5-Managed-by-VC-2-5-Across-Gigabit-MAN/m-p/2469766#M81372</guid>
      <dc:creator>rgv75</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-10T20:33:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ESX3.5 Managed by VC 2.5 Across Gigabit MAN</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vCenter-Server-Discussions/ESX3-5-Managed-by-VC-2-5-Across-Gigabit-MAN/m-p/2469767#M81373</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes - although we are now upgrading to ESX 3.5 from 3.0.1 and 2.5.x so we've had to break up the HA/DRS clusters in order to do the upgrades.  They will be reconfigured once all servers are upgraded.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:46:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vCenter-Server-Discussions/ESX3-5-Managed-by-VC-2-5-Across-Gigabit-MAN/m-p/2469767#M81373</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikepodoherty</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-11T02:46:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

