<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Should I use LAGs for vSphere hosts? in vSphere Hypervisor Discussions</title>
    <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vSphere-Hypervisor-Discussions/Should-I-use-LAGs-for-vSphere-hosts/m-p/443093#M917</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Personally, I do not see the advantage of ESXi hosts with LAGs outweighing the increased complexity they might introduce in most practical cases. Take a look at these articles explaining some pros and cons on this debate:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://wahlnetwork.com/2014/01/13/vsphere-need-lag-bandaids/" title="http://wahlnetwork.com/2014/01/13/vsphere-need-lag-bandaids/"&gt;http://wahlnetwork.com/2014/01/13/vsphere-need-lag-bandaids/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://wahlnetwork.com/2014/02/05/revenge-lag-networks-paradise/" title="http://wahlnetwork.com/2014/02/05/revenge-lag-networks-paradise/"&gt;http://wahlnetwork.com/2014/02/05/revenge-lag-networks-paradise/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Adding to the previous message, LACP is only supported on distributed vSwitches. The standard vSwitch only supports static etherchannel LAG with source/dest IP hashing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The dvSwitch LACP implementation in ESXi 5.5 supports a large number of different load balancing modes, see these articles for details:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://wahlnetwork.com/2014/02/19/exploring-enhanced-lacp-support-vsphere-5-5/" title="http://wahlnetwork.com/2014/02/19/exploring-enhanced-lacp-support-vsphere-5-5/"&gt;http://wahlnetwork.com/2014/02/19/exploring-enhanced-lacp-support-vsphere-5-5/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://wahlnetwork.com/2014/02/19/exploring-enhanced-lacp-support-vsphere-5-5/2/" title="http://wahlnetwork.com/2014/02/19/exploring-enhanced-lacp-support-vsphere-5-5/2/"&gt;http://wahlnetwork.com/2014/02/19/exploring-enhanced-lacp-support-vsphere-5-5/2/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:38:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MKguy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-12-17T13:38:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Should I use LAGs for vSphere hosts?</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vSphere-Hypervisor-Discussions/Should-I-use-LAGs-for-vSphere-hosts/m-p/443091#M915</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have two vSphere hosts (e.g., H0 and H1) with multi-port NICs connected to the same managed switch.&amp;nbsp; I want the VMs on both hosts to have the highest network throughput.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. On the switch, should I create two LAGs (e.g., LAG0 and LAG1); where LAG0's port members are connected to H0 and LAG1's port members are connected to H1? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Is it necessary to put LAG0 and LAG1 on the same VLAN for performance?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. Does vSphere support LACP?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 07:06:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vSphere-Hypervisor-Discussions/Should-I-use-LAGs-for-vSphere-hosts/m-p/443091#M915</guid>
      <dc:creator>g580</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-17T07:06:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should I use LAGs for vSphere hosts?</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vSphere-Hypervisor-Discussions/Should-I-use-LAGs-for-vSphere-hosts/m-p/443092#M916</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Exactly. If you want to use link aggregation you have to create a LAG for the NICs that will be participating.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;You will need to trunk the ports and assign the same VLAN access to them if you want both ESXi hosts to communicate with each other.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;It does, but not in a fashion I presume you are thinking. The LACP support comes in with "Load balancing via IP Hash" in vSwitch setting, but it does not make 2x 10GbE twice the speed. It just load-balances the outgoing traffic from VMs to different vnic depending on its IP. Otherwise LACP is there for failover purposes should one vnic fail, not to ncrease maximum speed. But if you have 10GbE I think this wouldn't be that needed anyway.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can achieve great performance by having your traffic split between more NICs - VM traffic, Storage and vMotion comes to mind but the gap slowly closes with the advent of converged network adapters.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 07:20:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vSphere-Hypervisor-Discussions/Should-I-use-LAGs-for-vSphere-hosts/m-p/443092#M916</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alistar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-17T07:20:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should I use LAGs for vSphere hosts?</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vSphere-Hypervisor-Discussions/Should-I-use-LAGs-for-vSphere-hosts/m-p/443093#M917</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Personally, I do not see the advantage of ESXi hosts with LAGs outweighing the increased complexity they might introduce in most practical cases. Take a look at these articles explaining some pros and cons on this debate:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://wahlnetwork.com/2014/01/13/vsphere-need-lag-bandaids/" title="http://wahlnetwork.com/2014/01/13/vsphere-need-lag-bandaids/"&gt;http://wahlnetwork.com/2014/01/13/vsphere-need-lag-bandaids/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://wahlnetwork.com/2014/02/05/revenge-lag-networks-paradise/" title="http://wahlnetwork.com/2014/02/05/revenge-lag-networks-paradise/"&gt;http://wahlnetwork.com/2014/02/05/revenge-lag-networks-paradise/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Adding to the previous message, LACP is only supported on distributed vSwitches. The standard vSwitch only supports static etherchannel LAG with source/dest IP hashing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The dvSwitch LACP implementation in ESXi 5.5 supports a large number of different load balancing modes, see these articles for details:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://wahlnetwork.com/2014/02/19/exploring-enhanced-lacp-support-vsphere-5-5/" title="http://wahlnetwork.com/2014/02/19/exploring-enhanced-lacp-support-vsphere-5-5/"&gt;http://wahlnetwork.com/2014/02/19/exploring-enhanced-lacp-support-vsphere-5-5/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://wahlnetwork.com/2014/02/19/exploring-enhanced-lacp-support-vsphere-5-5/2/" title="http://wahlnetwork.com/2014/02/19/exploring-enhanced-lacp-support-vsphere-5-5/2/"&gt;http://wahlnetwork.com/2014/02/19/exploring-enhanced-lacp-support-vsphere-5-5/2/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:38:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/vSphere-Hypervisor-Discussions/Should-I-use-LAGs-for-vSphere-hosts/m-p/443093#M917</guid>
      <dc:creator>MKguy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-17T13:38:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

