<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VSAN two host design in VMware vSAN Discussions</title>
    <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-vSAN-Discussions/VSAN-two-host-design/m-p/2213180#M8092</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello &lt;B&gt;singhraj&lt;/B&gt;​,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Disk-Groups require exactly 1 SSD as Cache-tier device and up to 7 HDDS/SSDs as Capacity-tier devices - you shouldn't attempt to mix and match Hybrid and All-Flash Disk-Groups either.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So yes, 4 Disk-Groups per node with 1 SSD + 1 HDD per host or 2 Disk-Groups with 1 SSD + 2 HDDs per host would be valid options here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would go with Witness over NUC if the other nodes are actual servers as the performance disparity between an actual server and a NUC would likely be large aand thus it will drag down the overall performance and/or stability. As this appears to be a home-lab/test setup you could also run the Witness on the NUC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 16:11:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TheBobkin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-12-11T16:11:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VSAN two host design</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-vSAN-Discussions/VSAN-two-host-design/m-p/2213179#M8091</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have two host &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;one hosd have 8 ssd and another host have 8 hhd&amp;nbsp; and one NUC with 2 ssd.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;my question is do i have to match ssd and hhd ( 4 ssd and 4 hhd per host and build 2 host vsan cluster with one witness node or build three node cluster with( 2 servers+one NUC)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 16:05:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-vSAN-Discussions/VSAN-two-host-design/m-p/2213179#M8091</guid>
      <dc:creator>singhraj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-11T16:05:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VSAN two host design</title>
      <link>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-vSAN-Discussions/VSAN-two-host-design/m-p/2213180#M8092</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello &lt;B&gt;singhraj&lt;/B&gt;​,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Disk-Groups require exactly 1 SSD as Cache-tier device and up to 7 HDDS/SSDs as Capacity-tier devices - you shouldn't attempt to mix and match Hybrid and All-Flash Disk-Groups either.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So yes, 4 Disk-Groups per node with 1 SSD + 1 HDD per host or 2 Disk-Groups with 1 SSD + 2 HDDs per host would be valid options here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would go with Witness over NUC if the other nodes are actual servers as the performance disparity between an actual server and a NUC would likely be large aand thus it will drag down the overall performance and/or stability. As this appears to be a home-lab/test setup you could also run the Witness on the NUC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 16:11:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.vmware.com/t5/VMware-vSAN-Discussions/VSAN-two-host-design/m-p/2213180#M8092</guid>
      <dc:creator>TheBobkin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-11T16:11:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

