Is lockin caused via vendors, their partners or by customers?



In my opinion it can be from either or all the above.



What is vendor lockin



Vendor lockin is a situation where a customer becomes dependent or locked in by choice or other circumstances to a particular supplier or technology.



What is the difference between vendor lockin, account control and stickiness?



Im sure some marketing wiz or sales type will be happy to explain the subtle differences. Generally speaking, lockin, stickiness and account control are essentially the same, or at least strive to obtain similar results. For example, vendor lockin too some has a negative stigma. However vendor stickiness may be a new term, perhaps even sounding cool thus it is not a concern. Remember the Mary Poppins song a spoon full of sugar makes the medicine go down? In other words sometimes changing and using a different term such as sticky vs vendor lockin helps make the situation taste better.



Is vendor lockin or stickiness a bad thing?



No, not necessarily, particularly if you the customer are aware and still in control of your environment.



I have had different views of vendor lockin over the years.



These have varied from when I was a customer working in IT organizations or being a vendor and later as an advisory analyst consultant. Even as a customer, I had different views of lockin which varied depending upon the situation. In some cases lockin was a result of upper management having their favorite vendor which meant when a change occurred further up the ranks, sometimes vendor lockin would shift as well. On the other hand, I also worked in IT environments where we had multiple vendors for different technologies to maintain competition across suppliers.



As a vendor, I was involved with customer sites that were best of breed while others were aligned around a single or few vendors. Some were aligned around technologies from the vendors I worked for and others were aligned with someone elses technology. In some cases as a vendor we were locked out of an account until there was a change of management or mandates at those sites. In other cases where lock out occurred, once our product was OEMd or resold by an incumbent vendor, the lockout ended.



Some vendors do a better job of establishing lockin, account management, account control or stickiness than compared to others. Some vendors may try to lock a customer in and thus there is perception that vendors lock customers in. Likewise, there is a perception that vendor lockin only occurs with the largest vendors however I have seen this also occur with smaller or niche vendors who gain control of their customers keeping larger or other vendors out.[Mary Poppins song a spoon full of sugar|]


Sweet, sticky Sue Bee Honey



Vendor lockin or stickiness is not always the result of the vendor, var, consultant or service provider pushing a particular technology, product or service. Customers can allow or enable vendor lockin as well, either by intent via alliances to drive some business initiative or accidentally by giving up account control management. Consequently vendor lockin is not a bad thing if it brings mutual benefit to the suppler and consumer.



On the other hand, if lockin causes hardship on the consumer while only benefiting the supplier, than it can be a bad thing for the customer.



Do some technologies lend themselves more to vendor lockin vs others?



Yes, some technologies lend themselves more to stickiness or lockin then others. For example, often big ticket or expensive hardware are seen as being vulnerable to vendor lockin along with other hardware items however software is where I have seen a lot of stickiness or lockin around.



However what about virtualization solutions after all the golden rule of virtualization is whoever controls the virtualization (hardware, software or services) controls the gold. This means that vendor lockin could be around a particular hypervisor or associated management tools.



How about bundled solutions or what are now called integrated vendor technology stacks including PODs (here or here) or vBlocks among others? How about databases, do they enable or facilitate vendor lockin? Perhaps, just like virtualization or operating systems or networking technology, storage system, data protection or other solutions, if you let the technology or vendor manage you, then you enable vendor lockin.



Where can vendor lockin or stickiness occur?



Application software, databases, data or information tools, messaging or collaboration, infrastructure resource management (IRM) tools ranging from security to backup to hypervisors and operating systems to email. Lets not forget about hardware which has become more interoperable from servers, storage and networks to integrated marketing or alliance stacks.



Another opportunity for lockin or stickiness can be in the form of drivers, agents or software shims where you become hooked on a feature functionality that then drives future decisions. In other words, lockin can occur in different locations both in traditional IT as well as via managed services, virtualization or cloud environments if you let it occur.



Keep these thoughts in mind:


  • Customers need to manage their resources and suppliers

  • Technology and their providers should work for you the customer, not the other way around

  • Technology providers conversely need to get closer to influence customer thinking

  • There can be cost with single vendor or technology sourcing due to loss of competition

  • There can be a cost associated with best of breed or functioning as your own integrator

  • There is a cost switching from vendors and or their technology to keep in mind

  • Managing your vendors or suppliers may be easier than managing your upper management

  • Vendors sales remove barriers so they can sell and setting barriers for others

  • Virtualization and cloud can be both a source for lockin as well as a tool to help prevent it

  • As a customer, if lockin provides benefits than it can be a good thing for all involved


Closing thoughts for now:



Ultimately, its up to the customer to manage their environment and thus have a say if they will allow vendor lockin. Granted, upper management may be the source of the lockin and not surprisingly is where some vendors will want to focus their attention directly, or via influence of high level management consultants.



So while a vendors solution may appear to be a locked in solution, it does not become a lockin issue or problem until a customer lets or allows it to be a lockin or sticky situation.



What is your take on vendor lockin? Cast your vote and see results in the following polls.



Is vendor lockin a good or bad thing?


Is vendor lockin a good or bad thing? Lockin is a bad thing for customers

Lockin is a good thing for vendors

Its only bad if you let it be a problem

Lockin is a myth, it died with the mainframe

Vote[View Results|javascript:PD_vote4054391(1);]


Who is responsible for managing vendor lockin


Who is responsible for, or preventing vendor lockin Its not a problem, why worry about it

Customers are responsible for thier environment

Vendors are responsible for thier customers

VARs need to look out for thier customers and partners

Virtualization and cloud have eliminated lockin

Vote[View Results|javascript:PD_vote4054404(1);]


Where is most common form or concern of vendor lockin


Where is most common form or concern of vendor lockin Business application software

Database software and tools

Operating systems and Hypervisors

Servers, storage or networks

Integrated hardware and software stacks

Cloud or managed services

Vote[View Results|javascript:PD_vote4054420(1);]


Cheers gs



Greg Schulz - Author The Green and Virtual Data Center (CRC) and Resilient Storage Networks (Elsevier)


twitter @storageio