-
1. Re: Early Access: VMware Validated Design for NSX-T in a Workload Domain
YvesHertoghs May 15, 2018 3:02 AM (in response to Mike Brown)Hey Mike, great work!
I was wondering though why figure 1-4 shows an NSX-V prepared management cluster? It looks like NSX-V is a requirement for an NSX-T VVD, while surely it is not?
-
2. Re: Early Access: VMware Validated Design for NSX-T in a Workload Domain
Mike Brown May 15, 2018 2:44 PM (in response to YvesHertoghs)Thanks!
The VVD requires NSX-V in the management cluster. It's not an NSX-T requirement but a VVD one.
Mike
--
Mike Brown, VCDX² (DCV & NV)
Senior SDDC Integration Architect
@vcdx71 -
3. Re: Early Access: VMware Validated Design for NSX-T in a Workload Domain
sholliday_aus Jun 19, 2018 9:24 PM (in response to Mike Brown)Hi mabrown76,
Just reading through and noticed that Table 2-3 Jumbo Frames Design Decisions mentions that Geneve overlay required an MTU value of 1600 bytes or greater.
Then later in the document under Table 2-16 Geneve Overlay Design Decisions & in the NSX-T - Physical Network Requirements sections it mentions that MTU size of 1700 or greater.
Pretty sure it should be a consistent minimum of 1700 or greater.
Regards,
Scott Holliday
-
4. Re: Early Access: VMware Validated Design for NSX-T in a Workload Domain
Mike Brown Aug 16, 2018 9:13 PM (in response to sholliday_aus)Thanks, we've got that fixed for the GA release.
--
Mike Brown, VCDX² (DCV & NV)
Senior SDDC Integration Architect
@vcdx71 -
5. Re: Early Access: VMware Validated Design for NSX-T in a Workload Domain
Mike Brown Nov 20, 2018 12:27 PM (in response to Mike Brown)An updated GA version is now available.
Architecture and Design of VMware NSX-T for Workload Domains
--
Mike Brown, VCDX² (DCV & NV)
Senior SDDC Integration Architect
@vcdx71