VMware Communities
JohnVTD
Contributor
Contributor

VMFS 5 max volume value

I don't often touch this part of vSphere; so I just want to know if I'm on solid ground. I need to consolidate a VM that has six VMDK files residing on several datastores. None of the VMDK files is over a TB. One of the underlying datastores could host all of the files if I expand it to 2.5TB from its current 1.5TB size. I have room on my iSCSI SAN to increase the size of the underlying SAN volume to accommodate the increase in the datastore. When I did a dry run on the SAN volume change, the SAN asked me if I really want to do this, because some OSs can't support a volume over 2TB. So I checked the vSphere 5.1 max configs and confirmed this:

vSphere_51 Max Cfgs.jpg

It says to me that VMFS can handle my underlying SAN volume if I expand the SAN volume to 2.5TB, but I don't know what that value is for "Raw Device Mapping size" and whether that pertains to my situation. Naturally, I'm not doing anything until somebody who does this part of vSphere more and better than I do tells me I'm good to go. Thanks!

0 Kudos
1 Reply
daphnissov
Immortal
Immortal

Your SAN is not aware of the filesystem that sits atop that LUN, so it is warning you that, for MBR filesystems, it may not recognize more than 2 TB, which is accurate. VMFS doesn't have this problem, and if you're not using RDMs then this wouldn't apply to you.

0 Kudos