1 Reply Latest reply: Aug 27, 2011 12:35 AM by hsn_hyperic RSS

    Support for install of HypericHQ on MS SQL Server

    maddogskip Hot Shot
      Are there plans to support an install of HypericHQ on SQL Server?


        • 1. DB2 would be better choice
          hsn_hyperic Hot Shot
          It has some considerable performance advantages over PGSQL?

          It would be better to support IBM DB2 9.7 instead. DB2 requires no performance tuning from administrator and free version from ibm can store unlimited amounts of data.

          Look at table in this TPC-B benchmark where DB2 won by huge margin mainly due to highly optimised write/log code path and HQ is doing lot of database writes and occasional reads.


          It would be better choice to do with DB2 instead.