VMware

This Question is Possibly Answered

1 "correct" answer available (10 pts) 1 "helpful" answer available (6 pts)
1 2 3 4 5 ... 8 Previous Next 109 Replies Last post: Jan 6, 2009 6:17 PM by st0mp   Go to original post
Click to view wiraone's profile Lurker 4 posts since
Jan 23, 2007
I'm having the same problem as others:

1. MacBook Pro 15" (Core2Duo) bought end of last year
2. MacOSX 10.4.10 updated with all patches available
3. Only G
4. Linksys WRT54G (no problem running Parallels 2.0)
5. I've the latest update, problem persists

One more thing that I observed is, if I'm near to the base station, I rarely get this error.
Click to view mjankor's profile Novice 10 posts since
Aug 18, 2007
Based on the various forum posts, I would like to consolidate and collect more information in this thread. Please respond here even if you responded elsewhere, it will allow us to more easily find trends if everyone responds here:

If you are having problems with bridged wireless networking:

1) What Mac do you have?
iMac 24" 2.33 with 7600GT

2) What version of Mac OS X are you running?
10.4.10

3) Are you running B, G, N or a combination of wireless networking technologies?
B,G &N on an Airport Extreme

4) What base station are you connected to?
Airpoirt Extreme 802.11N with fast ethernet

5) Have you applied the latest Airport Update from 7/30 and does it help?
Yes, and no.

6) If you are using N networking, if you drop back to G or B networking, does the problem occur?
Yes

OK, I've got some weird stuff happening here.
On my Macbook, first generation I have no problems at all running Fusion with bridged over the wireless.
On the iMac 24 I have no problems running bridged over wireless if I use an Airport Express.

If I switch to the Airport Extreme, using exactly the same settings my connection is killed. I can get an IP address from the Airport, but as soon as I try and do any serious work over the network the connection slows right down and is effectively useless. This affects the Mac as well and its networking gets hammered while i'm doing stuff in Fusion.

I hope this is of some help.
Click to view philozopher's profile Lurker 1 posts since
Aug 22, 2007
(1) MacBook Pro, 15"

Hardware Overview:
Model Name: MacBook Pro 15"
Model Identifier: MacBookPro2,2
Processor Name: Intel Core 2 Duo
Processor Speed: 2.16 GHz
Number Of Processors: 1
Total Number Of Cores: 2
L2 Cache (per processor): 4 MB
Memory: 2 GB
Bus Speed: 667 MHz
Boot ROM Version: MBP22.00A5.B01
SMC Version: 1.12f5

AirPort Card Information:
Wireless Card Type: AirPort Extreme
Wireless Card Locale: USA
Wireless Card Firmware Version: 1.1.9.3
Wireless Channel: 1

(2) Mac OS X 10.4.10 (8R2218)
(3) N
(4) Airport Extreme N, Firmware 7.1.1
(5) Yes. No.
(6) I have no way to tell since I cannot turn off "N" from my MBP or my AirPort

I would really like to use Bridged mode, but it is unusable. I thought it was because of my VPN software (Nortel Contivity), but I have been able to observe the problem even when I'm not connected to the VPN. I don't have this problem with NAT mode, but unfortunately this is not what I want to use. I would like my Windows Guests to be able to operate on my home network as a fully featured network client. I am about to try using a USB Wi-Fi adapter (Belkin F5D7050) to give my guest it's own network adapter to work around this issue. I hope it gets resolved soon!

[UPDATE 2007-08-23 00:38] Using the Belkin adapter proved to be flaky. The connection seemed to be active with a continuous ping (ping -t) to my public router, but Windows was reporting that the network adapter was disconnected. I was connecting to the same router as before. Also, CPU spiked between 77-110% while using the USB adapter. So much for that workaround.

Click to view Equinoxau's profile Lurker 1 posts since
Feb 28, 2007
When running in bridged mode, I keep getting the message:

"The wireless network appears to have been compromised and will be disabled for about a minute"."

It also brings down the Cisco 800 WAP at my work for 60 seconds, which was obviously irritating all my colleagues. The error log in IOS shows:

"Aug 23 10:05:30 172.16.11.1 1807: Aug 23 2007 10:05:28 AEST: %DOT11-4-
TKIP_MIC_FAILURE_REPORT: Received TKIP Michael MIC failure report
from the station 001b.63c5.bf65 on the packet (TSC=0x0) encrypted and
protected by pairwise key."

1) What Mac do you have?

MacBook Pro SR 2.4Ghz Core 2 Duo, 4GB RAM.

2) What version of Mac OS X are you running?

Mac OS X 10.4.10 (8R2232)

3) Are you running B, G, N or a combination of wireless networking technologies?

G

4) What base station are you connected to?

Cisco 800

5) Have you applied the latest Airport Update from 7/30 and does it help?

Yes, No

6) If you are using N networking, if you drop back to G or B networking, does the problem occur?

N/A

Click to view lajaro's profile Lurker 4 posts since
Aug 2, 2007
1) What Mac do you have?
- MacBook Pro3,1 - 2.2 GHz Core 2 Duo (SR)

2) What version of Mac OS X are you running?
- 10.4.10

3) Are you running B, G, N or a combination of wireless networking technologies?
- 802.11b/g

4) What base station are you connected to?
- Tried with Linksys WRT54G, Airport Express Base Station & FortiGate Wifi 60A

5) Have you applied the latest Airport Update from 7/30 and does it help?
- No/NA

6) If you are using N networking, if you drop back to G or B networking, does the problem occur?
- N/A
Click to view wingdo's profile Novice 29 posts since
Oct 17, 2006
1) MacBook Pro C2D 2.33GHz 3GB RAM

2) OS X 10.4.10

3) N router with N and G hosts

4) Airport Extreme N, Firmware 7.1.1

5) Yes, No

6) Yes
Click to view stevenoetic's profile Novice 6 posts since
May 2, 2007
Has there been any update from VMWare on this issue? It's a real show-stopper for me. I bought my license thinking "surely VMWare will figure this one out quickly", but I haven't heard a peep from their end.

Steve
Click to view mortimer snodgras's profile Lurker 1 posts since
May 29, 2006
1. MBP 2.4 (SR)
2. 10.4.10
3. Combination
4. Airport Extreme (802.11n)
5. Yes, no.
6. N/A

Problem doesn't seem to occur (or at least less frequently) with NAT. Haven't tried bridged with static IP.
Click to view mickymac's profile Lurker 2 posts since
Dec 22, 2006
Came across this info suggesting that the problem may be associated with WPA network security.

"A message integrity code (MIC) introduced though the 802.11i/WPA standard is a data authenticity mechanism that proves more effective than the integrity check value (ICV) within the original 802.11 standard. The MIC is used within both temporary key integrity protocol (TKIP) and counter-cipher-block chaining medium access control protocol (CCMP). The MIC is a tag computed using a keyed cryptographic function. This tag is transported over an unprotected channel with the data it is associated with. The receiver verifies its value using the same key and cryptographic function used to encode it. The MIC is susceptible to brute force attacks, so each MIC failure is assumed to be an attack. The host station and AP are required to re-key after the first attack. Any station, host station or AP will stop all communications for 60 seconds on a second attack."

I get the "Your wireless network has become compromised. It will now be shut down for 1 minute" message when bridged and am using WPA.
Click to view mbender71's profile Novice 14 posts since
Oct 29, 2006
Hi everyone,

I'm having the same problems as everyone here has stated where I loose network
connectivity for a second and then it comes back. I only know this because I loose all
my SMB shares from my server and I have to reattach them. But that is where my
similarity ends! Everyone here is talking about wireless where as I do NOT run wireless
on this machine. I am straight 1000BaseT to my server, but there is an Airport Extreme
set to 802.11n only for my other machines. I have not tested the Bridge vs. NAT solution
yet but hopefully this week I will. I REALLY love running Fusion in Unity mode but it was
quite annoying this long weekend as I kept loosing my servers. Last night I killed Fusion
and left my SMB connects and *POOF* they were still attached in the morning where as
when Fusion was running I'd get 15 minutes if I was lucky.

1) Aluminum 24" iMac w/3GB

2) OS X 10.4.10

3) Not on this machine. Airport is turned OFF. There is an airport extreme on the network
though.

4) Airport extreme w/802.11n exclusive

5) Latest firmware and software installed, does not help

6) Again, I get dropped off without wireless.. I'm not sure this is a "wireless" issue, you're
just hearing from a large number of wireless people

Many thanks and keep up the GREAT work!! VMware is the best!

Michael Bender
Orlando, FL
:-)

Click to view lawrance's profile Lurker 4 posts since
Sep 4, 2007
Running freebsd 6.2 as a guest, system locks up when scp'ing files across the network - if the interface is set up in "bridged" mode. Does not occur with "host only" mode.
http://www.vmware.com/community/thread.jspa?threadID=101274&tstart=0

1) What Mac do you have?

Mac Mini 1.83ghz core duo
Wireless Card Type: AirPort Extreme (0x168C, 0x86)
Wireless Card Locale: Worldwide
Wireless Card Firmware Version: 1.1.9.3

2) What version of Mac OS X are you running?

10.4.10

3) Are you running B, G, N or a combination of wireless networking technologies?

G

4) What base station are you connected to?

D-Link DI-524

5) Have you applied the latest Airport Update from 7/30 and does it help?

System is up to date, no it does not help

6) If you are using N networking, if you drop back to G or B networking, does the problem occur

Not applicable.
Click to view lajaro's profile Lurker 4 posts since
Aug 2, 2007
Looking further into this problem (bridged networks with the Airport card in SR MBPs). and trying out some of the suggested resolutions, I came across an interesting log entry in the system.log file:

Sep 4 12:21:00 LJR-MBP kernel[0] Your ethernet driver is not compatible with vmware's bridged networking.

Funny enough, after a search I haven't found any other posts citing a reference to this log entry.

Anyone else?
Click to view wingdo's profile Novice 29 posts since
Oct 17, 2006
Is any progress being made on this major bug? It has been a month since Pat asked for feedback and there hasn't been one word from vmware in this thread since then about the issue.

As someone who has moved from Parallels to vmware, I am amazed at how calm this thread has been. If PD went a month without responding to a bug which kept killing OS X's network connection, their forums would be jumping with people complaining, while everyone over here on these forums would be laughing at how PD isn't responding to the issue.

I need to have a stable network connection. It would be bad if the VM's network connection died. HAving the host's network connection die as well is unacceptable for a release product.
Click to view Xipper's profile Novice 29 posts since
Aug 14, 2007
I assume the "bridged network issue" is the one that results in the airport process' high cpu utilization.

1) What Mac do you have?
MBP 2.4Ghz (Santa Rosa)

2) What version of Mac OS X are you running?
10.4.10 with all public updates

3) Are you running B, G, N or a combination of wireless networking technologies?
B and G

4) What base station are you connected to?
Linksys, Cisco, others

5) Have you applied the latest Airport Update from 7/30 and does it help?
applied, no help

6) If you are using N networking, if you drop back to G or B networking, does the problem occur?
not tested

-
any ETA on a resolution to this? This is a major issue, and NAT is not a viable option for anyone using IPSEC or VoIP. This either needs to be resolved or VMware should start offering refunds.

VMware should also step up to the plate and offer all users that purchased this "beta" copy of 1.0 full support until after at least the common bugs are resolved. Of course, this doesn't add value when the support department is incapable of providing meaningful support anyway.

The product is no longer "beta", so why are we suffering through problems that should have been resolved from Beta testing?
Click to view lawrance's profile Lurker 4 posts since
Sep 4, 2007
I agree that some form of response is required - sooner rather than later. These things happen and I'm quite willing to wait for a fix, as long as I have the necessary information to make a decision inside the 30 day refund window.

VMware Developer

SDKs, APIs, Videos, Learn and much more in the Developer community.

Learn More

Developer Sample Code

Increase your developer productivity with VMware API sample code.

Learn More

VMworld Sessions & Labs

Online access to the latest VMworld Sessions & Labs and online services.

Learn more

Purchase PSO Credits Online

Purchase credits to redeem training and consulting services online.

Buy Now

Community Hardware Software

View reported configurations or report your own.

Learn More

VMware vSphere

Come witness the next giant leap in virtualization.

Register Today

Communities