I am also looking for a hardware solution that supports sharing USB over IP (aka USB Servers). Here is information about 5 hardware devices, that I obtained from their websites:
Keyspan - model U2S-2A (2-port)
- supported OS: WinXP or Vista (32bit), MacOS X v10.3.9 or greater
- supports 8 connections???
- does not currently support attachment of USB hubs (expected in future firmware)
- PROS: claims it can support any USB device that is NOT an isochronous device or an ILOK dongle by PACE
CONS: Limited documentation for this model
Silex technology - model SX-2000U2 (1-port)
- supported OS: W2K, WinXP, Vista, MacOS X
- supports 15 connections (incl. hub)
- PROS: Frequent firmware updates, supports more connections
- CONS: only one port
Lantronix - model UBox 2100 (2-port)
- supported OS: W2K, WinXP
- supports 8 connections???
- Isochronous audio/video support
- PROS: First and currently only to claim to support isochronous transfers
- CONS: Limited documentation on this model
Belkin - model F5L009 (5-port)
- supported OS: WinXP,Vista (incl 64bit), MacOS 10.4 (beta)
- supports 16 connections
- PROS: Sexy looking, supports more connections, comes already with 5 ports, claims it may supported isochronous transfers in future update
- CONS: reports suggests poor performance with drives, but this may be a perception issue
IOGear - model GMFPSU22W6 (2-Port)
- supported OS: W2K, WinXP
- supports 5 connections
- PROS: supports a storage server mode, allowing multiple user access
- CONS: don't have any info yet on this model
I am only comparing USB2.0 hi-speed (upto 480Mbps) models, even though most of these mfg have full-speed (upto 12 Mbps) models too. All seem to sell for approximately $130 and support common features like WLAN compatible, printer auto-connect share, 500mA power per port. Plus some mfg are looking to add more features in future firmware and driver releases. Early testing suggest that these units perform marginally better than USB1.1 devices, due to the network connection (latency), but I am curious about the performance of the Lantronix model that claims to support isochronous transfers.