VMware

ToddMuirhead

ToddMuirhead's Profile

ToddMuirhead's Latest Content

I really like to include graphs in my whitepapers and blog posts whenever possible. I find that lots of people read the first few pages or paragraphs, then skip to the graphs. And if they are really interested they will go back and read the sections that interest them.

In my recent blog post on VROOM! I spent a bit more time that usual on the graph. It seemed that everybody who reviewed the blog post had a couple of comments - About the graph. It started out with what was probably too much data and ended up a much better and simplified graph due to all the comments. Thanks for all the help to those who commented.

Just for fun I have decided to post the original version of the graph below. You can compare it with the final version that was published on VROOM! Comments are welcome :)

1vCPUwFTvs2vCPUgraph_originalversion.JPG

The big difference with this earlier version is that there are more data points included for both FT enabled and disabled. I had also used a different color for the previous generation processor tests to make it easier to spot them. Once I decided that all these data points weren't needed the different colors weren't needed either.

Even though I agree that the final version is easier to read and understand, part of me still likes this earlier version with more data that takes a few minutes to figure out what is going on.

Todd

0 Comments Permalink

As part of attending VMworld, I was asked to put together a trip report. I decided to make it into a blog post and share it with everybody who might be interested. I also was using twitter throughout the conference and a good way to see that version of events is through this twitter search.

I started the conference by attending a lunch with some customers. I was the SME for the Exchange table and we had a great discussion about virtualizing Exchange. Some customers had already virtualized Exchange and others were still in the planning phases. Two key points came out of the discussion: Make sure that your storage is sized properly and the move to virtual is a good opportunity to identify any issues with your Exchange environment and fix them. I pointed everybody to the VROOM! blog for lots of indepth info on performance of Exchange and other apps on vSphere.

On Monday night I participated in the VMworld fun run over the Golden Gate bridge. I've run a lot of places, but the golden gate bridge just before sunset was the best. It's difficult to describe the view of the sun setting behind the hills with the Pacific ocean on one side and the bay and the city of San Francisco in the late sunlight on the other. All I can say is that you should see it yourself.

I went to Paul Maritz's keynote on Tuesday morning and then attended several sessions. One was on the military's project to virtualize 750,000 Exchange mailboxes. There are lots of ways that their environment is not typical, but is was interesting to hear how they approached such a big project. I also went to a session on virtualizing SAP which included some cool results showing big performance gains with vSphere and Nehalem (Maybe not so surprising, but interesting none the less). Session on Oracle on vSphere was good and covered support, licensing, and performance (I wish the performance stuff had been first - but maybe I'm a bit biased).

I was one of the facilitators for the Birds of a Feather session on virtualizing databases. The session took place at 5 pm on Tue and Wed. The late timing thinned the crowd a bit, but the discussions we had were good. The first day we talked about performance, licensing, and storage. In storage we talked about how VMFS and RDM provided essentially the same performance, and the default choice should be VMFS. The second day we had a different set of people (including 5 VMware performance engineers) and had a discussion that included some of the same topics. Storage was once again a discussion point with Fibre Channel, iSCSI, and NFS options. Although the BoF sessions were lightly attended, I feel that the people that attended really benefited. We need to figure out how to do a better job of making people aware of these sessions.

On Wed morning I presented Exchange Server 2007 Performance on vSphere as part of 90 minute session on Exchange on vSphere. We had a full room of about 700 and managed to finish on time with about 10 minutes for questions. I had a few questions: How the storage was configured for some of the tests? How would FT perform with more than one VM? and Where the tests done with 10G ethernet for iSCSI and NFS? After the official Q and A we had a group of about 20 come up for more questions and we talked until we were kicked out of the room. I thought that it went great. Thanks to co-presenters Dave Korusunsky, Charles Windom (VMware) and Terrance Chong (Marvell).

I also spent a lot of time at VMworld meeting with people that I normally only interact with over email and twitter. This was probably the most valuable aspect of the conference for me because I work out of the Austin office and don't get many chances to meet face to face. The funny part is that I probably ran into the most people during the big party on Wednesday night. (I thought about trying to list all of the twitterverse that I met, but decided it would take too much time and I would probably leave somebody out.)

Great conference and I look forward to next year.


Todd

0 Comments Permalink


After two full days of VMworld 2009 I have some impressions on the show. The first is that desktop and/or client virtualization is a big deal. Lots of people are here to learn what the latest is and figure out how to do it when they get home. I would say that this wave is bigger than last year.

In my own field of enterprise applications there is a broader acceptance that the performance is good. This is true due to better performance with vSphere, new processor virtualization features in latest generations, and more customers talking about successful implementation of Exchange, SQL, SAP, Oracle, etc. More discussion around best practices and reference architectures are happening than in the past, which seems like a change to me.

The competitive questions around other virtualization options is much lower this year. At least I haven't heard as many questions or as much discussion about it.

These final few things are less significant: More smokers outside the entrance, fewer giveaway bouncy balls, more giveaway t-shirts, and no racecars at the big VMworld party.

Todd


0 Comments Permalink

Brainstorm with co-workers, get your questions answered, build status with your responses.

Write your own drafts, invite selected collaborators, or leave it open for all to pitch in.

Communities