VMware

This Question is Not Answered

1 "correct" answer available (10 pts) 1 "helpful" answer available (6 pts)
4 Replies Last post: Oct 15, 2007 2:05 PM by fbx  

Fusion or Parallels for use with Bootcamp installation? posted: Oct 14, 2007 5:51 PM

Click to view fbx's profile Enthusiast 74 posts since
Mar 20, 2007

I've given up using either Parallels or Fusion full time with Windows and I have rebuilt a Bootcamp partition and install.

Both Parallels and Fusion are just way too slow and untrustworthy on my white iMac 2.0GHz with 2G of ram.

However, I would like to hook up by Bootcamp setup via one or the other in OSX, and I'm wondering which of the two would be safer? Not really intereted in speed here, as when I've got substantial work to do in Windows I'll do it in the Bootcamp install.

I've read that Parallels replaces certain Windows files when setup with Bootcamp. Is this true? THis seems like a good reason to go with Fusion.

Posting this note on both msg boards, of course.

Thanks for any help and advice--
Click to view etung's profile Guru 11,086 posts since
Oct 15, 2006
Fusion ... just way too slow and untrustworthy on my white iMac 2.0GHz with 2G of ram.

Sorry to hear that. Is this the keyboard/mouse problems you reported (but never followed up on), or something else? Can you be more specific about what is slow/untrustworthy?

I've read that Parallels replaces certain Windows files when setup with Bootcamp. Is this true? THis seems like a good reason to go with Fusion.

Last I checked, yes. Parallels does not support ACPI, so to get Boot Camp to work they have to replace the HAL (i.e. hal.dll) with a non-ACPI one. Their 3D acceleration depends on replacing some other dlls. In contrast, we don't have to do this.
Click to view etung's profile Guru 11,086 posts since
Oct 15, 2006
fbx wrote:

Everything just slows down--starting programs, saving within programs, switching programs, moving stuff, changes places within programs, etc.


Do you have any hard numbers about the slowdown? Anything in particular (CPU/RAM/disk) getting stressed? For casual use, I don't think a virtual machine should be significantly slower than native.

With Fusion, I started getting strange messages about problems it was having booting. But then I restarted OSX and it worked fine again, so I don't know what the problem was.

We'd like to hear about any problems. I don't suppose you remember any more detail?

Also, since I'm the one who's probably kept telling you about Parallel's Boot Camp shenanagins, you might want third-party verification. See for example:

http://www.algorithm.com.au/blog/files/vmware-fusion-beta-3-vs-parallels.php (hal.dll, ntoskrnl.exe. boot.ini)
http://forums.parallels.com/nextnewesttothread12446.html (ddraw.dll, d3d8.dll, d3d9.dll)

And you can also search Parallel's forum for more information on these files.

VMware Developer

SDKs, APIs, Videos, Learn and much more in the Developer community.

Learn More

Developer Sample Code

Increase your developer productivity with VMware API sample code.

Learn More

VMworld Sessions & Labs

Online access to the latest VMworld Sessions & Labs and online services.

Learn more

Purchase PSO Credits Online

Purchase credits to redeem training and consulting services online.

Buy Now

Community Hardware Software

View reported configurations or report your own.

Learn More

VMware vSphere

Come witness the next giant leap in virtualization.

Register Today

Communities