Jon,
I believe Rob understands your point. A guest OS
running inside of VMware will not reflect the
presence of VT, that does not mean the host
application isn't taking advantage of VT. That just
means a guest OS attempting to leverage VT will not
attempt VT virtualization within virtualization, e.g.
running Xen 3.0 in a guest OS.
Obviously. I agree.
The 64-bit guest OS application test means little as
there are 64-bit processors without VT.
Are then saying that is possible to have Intel non-VT processor (or VT disabled in BIOS), EMT64 capable, and 64-bit guest OS?
Do you have an example of that?
VMware says if your CPU possesses VT capabilities and
that capability isn't disabled by BIOS, then they
will leverage those instructions. It appears you
want some sort of confirmation like in the vmware.log
or in the About Box or something like "Running with
VT".
Unlike hyperthreading which manifests itself clearly
with more logical processors, active VT is not nearly
as obvious.
I thought that VMware 64-bit check utility was sufficient proof of VMware ability to leverage VT class instructions.
You disagree?