1 Reply Latest reply: Aug 27, 2011 12:35 AM by hsn_hyperic RSS

Support for install of HypericHQ on MS SQL Server

maddogskip Hot Shot
maddogskip (12 posts since Jul 9, 2008) Oct 14, 2008 12:36 PM
Currently Being Moderated
Are there plans to support an install of HypericHQ on SQL Server?

Thank...

Tom
  • 32 Views
  • 1. DB2 would be better choice
    hsn_hyperic Hot Shot
    hsn_hyperic (6 posts since Jun 14, 2009) Aug 27, 2011 12:35 AM (in response to maddogskip)
    Currently Being Moderated
    It has some considerable performance advantages over PGSQL?

    It would be better to support IBM DB2 9.7 instead. DB2 requires no performance tuning from administrator and free version from ibm can store unlimited amounts of data.

    Look at table in this TPC-B benchmark where DB2 won by huge margin mainly due to highly optimised write/log code path and HQ is doing lot of database writes and occasional reads.

    http://www.linuxsoft.cz/article.php?id_article=1771

    It would be better choice to do with DB2 instead.

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Legend

  • Correct Answers - 10 points
  • Helpful Answers - 6 points

Share This Page