Skip navigation
VMware

This Question is Answered (go to answer)

2 "helpful" answers available (6 pts)
471 Views 3 Replies Last post: Feb 22, 2012 10:37 AM by hjnorris RSS
jpl0000 Novice 11 posts since
Jan 24, 2011
Currently Being Moderated

Dec 22, 2011 5:30 AM

Oracle ASM, SAN and VMware

Hello,

 

I have a question about using Oracle ASM. If I only have one physical SAN disk (2 disks mirrored) isolated for an Oracle VM is there any point in implementing ASM in the VMs filesystem by creating multiple virtual disks to support ASM if any IO is still really only accessing one physical disk? This is the first time I will have to do an Oracle VM install and I want to make sure the DBAs have the right info for setting up the DB.

 

I see that it is tip #14 in the Essentiual Deployment tips doc to use Oracle ASM but it doesn't say anything about assumptions...eg: Is there more than one physical disk available? I am thinking the DBA doesn't want to bother with ASM as there is only one physical disk under this VM but we are in a virtual world now and I don't think the same that would be true for a physical server is necessarily the case for a virtual one.

 

Thanks

Josh26 Master 979 posts since
Mar 15, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
1. Dec 22, 2011 8:28 PM in response to: jpl0000
Re: Oracle ASM, SAN and VMware

Hi,

 

ASM gives you several other benefits.

 

It improves the filesystem overhead over ext3, and deals with having to concern yourself about file paths. Most Oracle documents will assume you have ASM - I think it's worth it.

hjnorris Novice 4 posts since
Feb 17, 2012
Currently Being Moderated
3. Feb 22, 2012 10:37 AM in response to: jpl0000
Re: Oracle ASM, SAN and VMware

You have only one disk and a 100Mb database?   In this case, ASM is probably an extra layer of complexity that you do not need.

 

ASM is best suited for spreading data across many, many spindles and in cases where database space management is a consideration.

Bookmarked By (0)

Share This Page

Communities