<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:clearspace="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/clearspace/rss" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>VMware Communities: Message List - Note for Workstation 6.5.1-126130 with 2.6.29 RC kernels</title>
    <link>http://communities.vmware.com/community/vmtn/desktop/workstation?view=discussions</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:56:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Clearspace 1.10.12 (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2009-04-21T20:56:34Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Note for Workstation 6.5.1-126130 with 2.6.29 RC kernels</title>
      <link>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1231927?tstart=0#1231927</link>
      <description>Thank you so much, Works under Arch Linux X86_64 with Kernel 2.6.29-3, with the newest version of VMware Workstation 6.5.2 &lt;img class="jive-emoticon" border="0" src="http://communities.vmware.com/images/emoticons/grin.gif" alt=":D" /&gt;.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:56:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>MarcoRosso</author>
      <guid>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1231927?tstart=0#1231927</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-04-21T20:56:34Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>7 months, 5 days ago</clearspace:dateToText>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Note for Workstation 6.5.1-126130 with 2.6.29 RC kernels</title>
      <link>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1213682?tstart=0#1213682</link>
      <description>I tried these patches and, unfortunately, they didn't quite work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, I made my own patch.  I recommend it, because it fixes a few bugs, such as the cap_raise() issue that was mentioned above.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's the new patch, in another forum posting:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a class="jive-link-external" href="http://communities.vmware.com//message/1213099"&gt;http://communities.vmware.com//message/1213099&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hope this helps!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Josh</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:46:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Krellan</author>
      <guid>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1213682?tstart=0#1213682</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-03-31T17:46:06Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>7 months, 3 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Note for Workstation 6.5.1-126130 with 2.6.29 RC kernels</title>
      <link>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1210084?tstart=0#1210084</link>
      <description>I do not fully understand what happens and how, but I got it to work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Somehow the vm_check_build checks called in Makefile.kernel seem to fail / give wrong results - so I just disabled them, what is'nt the clean solution, of course.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throwing away anything dealing with dev-&amp;gt;priv as in the patch posted here before does not seem to be correct, comparing 2.6.28 and 2.6.29 yields dev-&amp;gt;ml_priv.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:06:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>mleun</author>
      <guid>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1210084?tstart=0#1210084</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-03-26T22:06:17Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>8 months, 1 day ago</clearspace:dateToText>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Note for Workstation 6.5.1-126130 with 2.6.29 RC kernels</title>
      <link>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1206712?tstart=0#1206712</link>
      <description>Can someone provide a patch for the host-only-network? I (and many others) would be very happy to see one.&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks in advance!</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:58:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>zwierbel</author>
      <guid>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1206712?tstart=0#1206712</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-03-23T20:58:26Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>8 months, 4 days ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>1</clearspace:replyCount>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Note for Workstation 6.5.1-126130 with 2.6.29 RC kernels</title>
      <link>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1194084?tstart=0#1194084</link>
      <description>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class="jive-thread-reply-body-container"&gt;&amp;gt;With the patch I can compile the modules, but with 2.6.29-rc6. BUT I can not access the other system over the network.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p /&gt;
but with 2.6.29-rc6.... what - (try making a complete sentence).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But indeed, "Host-only networking" is broken. Bridged works fine, though.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:08:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>tarantula2</author>
      <guid>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1194084?tstart=0#1194084</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-03-10T12:08:40Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>8 months, 2 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>2</clearspace:replyCount>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Note for Workstation 6.5.1-126130 with 2.6.29 RC kernels</title>
      <link>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1185946?tstart=0#1185946</link>
      <description>With the patch I can compile the modules, but with 2.6.29-rc6. BUT I can not access the other system over the network. I'm seeing just ARP traffic between the two systems.&lt;br /&gt;
17:06:21.312128 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.100.2 tell 192.168.100.100, length 28&lt;br /&gt;
17:06:21.312151 ARP, Reply 192.168.100.2 is-at 00:50:56:c0:00:01, length 28&lt;br /&gt;
17:06:26.628204 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.100.2 tell 192.168.100.100, length 28&lt;br /&gt;
17:06:26.628233 ARP, Reply 192.168.100.2 is-at 00:50:56:c0:00:01, length 28&lt;br /&gt;
17:06:31.669908 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.100.2 tell 192.168.100.100, length 28&lt;br /&gt;
17:06:31.669941 ARP, Reply 192.168.100.2 is-at 00:50:56:c0:00:01, length 28&lt;br /&gt;
17:06:36.752712 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.100.2 tell 192.168.100.100, length 28&lt;br /&gt;
17:06:36.752743 ARP, Reply 192.168.100.2 is-at 00:50:56:c0:00:01, length 28&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guest system has no ARP entry in his table.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has someone a solution? Thanks in advance!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regards</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:11:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>zwierbel</author>
      <guid>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1185946?tstart=0#1185946</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-03-02T16:11:46Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>8 months, 3 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>3</clearspace:replyCount>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Note for Workstation 6.5.1-126130 with 2.6.29 RC kernels</title>
      <link>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1185704?tstart=0#1185704</link>
      <description>&lt;br /&gt;
This chunk in the .diff you posted seems a bit suspect to me:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p /&gt;
 +#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE &amp;lt; KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 29)&amp;middot; &lt;br /&gt;
    cap_raise(current-&amp;gt;cap_effective, CAP_SYS_RESOURCE); &lt;br /&gt;
    compat_set_user_nice(current, linuxState.fastClockPriority); &lt;br /&gt;
+#else /* 2.6.29 */ &lt;br /&gt;
+   (void) cap_raised(current-&amp;gt;cred-&amp;gt;cap_effective, CAP_SYS_RESOURCE); &lt;br /&gt;
+   set_user_nice(current, linuxState.fastClockPriority); &lt;br /&gt;
+#endif /* 2.6.29 and higher */&amp;middot;&amp;middot;&amp;middot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p /&gt;
cap_raise  suddenly became  cap_raised, which does not have the same effect.  Are you sure this is ok?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:27:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>tarantula2</author>
      <guid>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1185704?tstart=0#1185704</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-03-02T12:27:33Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>8 months, 3 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>4</clearspace:replyCount>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Note for Workstation 6.5.1-126130 with 2.6.29 RC kernels</title>
      <link>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1161706?tstart=0#1161706</link>
      <description>Many thanks. That patch worked fine on x86 (32 bit) too</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 09:06:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>planetf1a</author>
      <guid>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1161706?tstart=0#1161706</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-02-04T09:06:22Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>9 months, 3 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Note for Workstation 6.5.1-126130 with 2.6.29 RC kernels</title>
      <link>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1160763?tstart=0#1160763</link>
      <description>I wanted to let people over in this forum know, that currently Workstation 6.5.1 doesn't build the modules on 2.6.29-RC3 kernels. However, over in the Server forums, &lt;a class="jive-link-profile" href="http://communities.vmware.com/people/Ehud"&gt;Ehud&lt;/a&gt;, with the help of  &lt;a class="jive-link-profile" href="http://communities.vmware.com/people/stericho"&gt;stericho&lt;/a&gt;, have come up with a patch to the modules to get them to build. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The link to the thread: &lt;a class="jive-link-message" href="http://communities.vmware.com/message/1141306#1141306"&gt;[Linux] After upgrading kernel from 2.6.28 (stab) to 2.6.29-rc1 / Vmware compile problem&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Direct link to the Patch (Made by Ehud, modified by stericho): &lt;a class="jive-link-attachment" href="http://communities.vmware.com/servlet/JiveServlet/download/2835-188410-1149089-18058/vmware-workstation-6.5.1.126130-2.6.29_x86_64.patch"&gt;vmware-workstation-6.5.1.126130-2.6.29_x86_64.patch&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Directions for applying the Patch:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One liner (as root):  cd /usr/lib/vmware/modules/source/; mkdir orig; cp *.tar orig/; for i in `ls *.tar`; do tar -xf $i; done; rm *.tar; patch -p1 -i &lt;b&gt;/path/to/vmware-workstation-6.5.1.126130-2.6.29_x86_64.patch&lt;/b&gt;; for i in mblock mci mmon mnet mppuser sock; do tar -cf v$i.tar v$i-only; done; rm -r *-only&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just make sure you change the path to the patch.  This will also backup the original modules, just in case something gets foobar'd.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Note: This has only been tried, and verified to work on x86_64 machines.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If something isn't correct, please correct me on it.&lt;br /&gt;
I hope this helps others as it has helped me.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:50:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>sedorox</author>
      <guid>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1160763?tstart=0#1160763</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-02-03T15:50:25Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>9 months, 3 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>8</clearspace:replyCount>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

